Judge: Kerry Bensinger, Case: 22STCV19361, Date: 2023-02-01 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV19361 Hearing Date: February 1, 2023 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff, vs.
CHRISTINA
MACEDO,
Defendant. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO COMPEL
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSES TO DISCOVERY, AND REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS
Dept.
27 1:30
p.m. February
1, 2023 |
On June 14,
2022 Plaintiff Fiona Billings (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendant
Christina Macedo (“Defendant”) for injuries arising from a motor vehicle
accident. On July 20, 2022, Defendant served Form Interrogatories (Set One) on Plaintiff. Having received no responses, Defendant
proceeded to file the motions compelling Plaintiff to provide responses. Defendant also requests monetary sanctions.
Compel
Responses
Where a party fails to serve timely
responses to discovery requests, the court may make an order compelling
responses. (Code Civ. Proc., §§
2030.290, 2031.300; Healthcare
Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th
390, 403.) A party that fails to serve
timely responses waives any objections to the request, including ones based on
privilege or the protection of attorney work product. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2030.290, subd. (a),
2031.300, subd. (a).) Unlike a motion to
compel further responses, a motion to
compel responses is not subject to a 45-day time limit and the propounding
party has no meet and confer obligations.
(Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting,
Inc., supra, 148 Cal.App.4th at
p. 404.)
Plaintiff has failed to file an opposition
and failed to inform the Court whether responses were provided or were
forthcoming.
Accordingly, Defendant’s motion to
compel responses is GRANTED.
Monetary Sanctions
Where the court grants a motion to
compel responses, sanctions shall be imposed against the party who
unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion to compel, unless the party acted with
substantial justification or the sanction would otherwise be unjust. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290, subd.
(c).)
Defendant’s request for sanctions is
GRANTED. Sanctions are imposed against Plaintiff
in the reduced amount of $750.00 for 3 hours at Defendant’s counsel’s hourly
rate of $230.00 and $60.00 in filing fees, to be paid within twenty (20) days
of the date of this Order.
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org.
Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to
appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the
hearing and argue the matter. Unless you
receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume
that others might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from the
parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
Dated this 1st day of February 2023
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Kerry Bensinger Judge of the Superior Court
|