Judge: Kerry Bensinger, Case: 22STCV27324, Date: 2023-03-23 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV27324 Hearing Date: March 23, 2023 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff, vs.
CITY
OF LOS ANGELES, et al.,
Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE:
(1) DEFENDANT THE MARIA V. ESTRADA FAMILY TRUST’S MOTION TO
COMPEL PLAINTIFF ALICIA STEPHANIE CLARK TO SERVE FURTHER RESPONSE TO FORM
INTERROGATORIES SET ONE; MOTION FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF AND
COUNSEL (2) DEFENDANT THE MARIA V. ESTRADA FAMILY TRUST’S MOTION TO
COMPEL PLAINTIFF ALICIA STEPHANIE CLARK TO SERVE FURTHER RESPONSE TO REQUESTS
FOR ADMISSIONS, SET ONE; MOTION FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF AND
COUNSEL Dept.
27 1:30
p.m. March
23, 2023 |
On August 23, 2023, plaintiff Alicia
Stephanie Clark (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against defendants City of Los
Angeles, MDU Construction Services Group, Inc., International Line Builders,
Inc., and the Maria V. Estrada Family Trust for injuries arising from a trip
and fall occurring on March 1, 2021.
On February 1, 2023, defendant Maria V.
Estrada Family Trust (hereinafter, “Defendant”) filed the instant motions to
compel Plaintiff’s further responses to Defendant’s Form Interrogatories, Set
One, Nos. 14.1 and 17.1, and Request for Admissions, Set One, No. 2.
Defendant’s motions are procedurally
deficient. Pursuant to Section 9,
subdivision E of the Eighth Amended Standing Order for
Procedures in the Personal Injury Hub Courts for the County of Los Angeles,
Central District (“Eighth Amended Hub Order”), Personal Injury (“PI”) Hub
Courts will not hear Motions to Compel Further Discovery Responses to Discovery
until the parties have engaged in an Informal Discovery Conference (IDC). PI Hub Courts may deny or continue a Motion
to Compel Further Responses to Discovery if parties fail to schedule and
complete an IDC before the scheduled hearing on a Motion to Compel Further
Responses to Discovery. Here, the
parties have not scheduled or completed an IDC prior to the hearing for these
motions.
The Eighth Amended Hub Order further
provides: After meeting and conferring
about available dates for an IDC, the moving/propounding party shall reserve an
IDC through [the Court Reservation System (“CRS”)] and provide notice of the
reserved IDC to the opposing/responding party by filing and serving an Informal
Discovery Conference Form for Personal Injury Courts (LASC CIV 239) at least 15
court days before the IDC and attach the CRS reservation receipt as the last
page. The IDC will not be “scheduled” by
the court until the IDC Form is filed.
The opposing/responding party may file and serve a responsive IDC Form
at least 10 court days before the IDC.
All parties shall briefly set forth their respective positions on the
pending discovery issues on the IDC Form.
Based on the foregoing, the Court
CONTINUES the hearing on Defendant’s motions to July 6, 2023 at 1:30 p.m. in
Department 27 of the Spring Street Courthouse which should allow the parties
sufficient time to schedule the IDC.
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org.
Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to
appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the
hearing and argue the matter. Unless you
receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume
that others might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from the
parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
Dated this 23rd day of March 2023
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Kerry Bensinger Judge of the Superior Court |