Judge: Kerry Bensinger, Case: 23STCV10754, Date: 2025-02-13 Tentative Ruling
Counsel may submit on the tentative ruling by emailing Dept. 31 before 8:30 the morning of the hearing. The email address is smcdept31@lacourt.org. Please do not call the court to submit on the tentative. Please do not submit to the tentative ruling on behalf of the opposing party. Please do not e-mail the Court if you plan to appear and argue.
In deciding whether to submit on the tentative ruling or attend the hearing and present oral argument, please keep the following in mind:
The tentative rulings authored by this court reflect that the court has read and considered all pleadings and evidence timely submitted to the court in connection with the motion, opposition, and reply (if any). Because the pleadings were filed, they are part of the public record.
Oral argument is not an opportunity to simply regurgitate that which a party set forth in its pleadings. Nor, is oral argument an opportunity to "make a record" when there is no court reporter present and the statements and arguments of counsel are already part of the record because they were set forth in the pleadings. Finally, simply because a party or attorney disagrees with the court's analysis and ruling or is not satisfied with it does not necessarily warrant oral argument when no new arguments will be articulated.
If you submit on the tentative, you must immediately notify all other parties email that you will not appear at the hearing. If you submit on the tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the motions. If all parties to the motion submit, this tentative ruling will become the final ruling after the hearing date and it will be memorialized in a minute order. This tentative ruling is not an invitation, nor an opportunity, to file further documents relative to the hearing in question. No such document will be considered by the Court.
**Tentative rulings on Motions for Summary Judgment will only be available for review in the courtroom on the day of the hearing.
Case Number: 23STCV10754 Hearing Date: February 13, 2025 Dept: 31
Tentative Ruling
Judge Kerry Bensinger, Department 31
HEARING DATE: February 13, 2025 TRIAL DATE: Not set
CASE: Cudahy Cecilia, LLC v. City of Cudahy
CASE NO.: 23STCV10754
DEMURRER
WITHOUT MOTION TO STRIKE
MOVING PARTY: Defendant
City of Cudahy
RESPONDING PARTY: No opposition
On October 14, 2024, Plaintiff, Cudahy Cecilia, LLC, filed a
Complaint against Defendant, City of Cudahy, for declaratory relief and
injunctive relief.
On November
23, 2024, Defendant filed this demurrer to the Complaint.
On January
29, 2025, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint (FAC).
“A party may amend its pleading once without leave of the
court at any time before the answer, demurrer, or motion to strike is filed, or
after a demurrer or motion to strike is filed but before the demurrer or motion
to strike is heard if the amended pleading is filed and served no later than
the date for filing an opposition to the demurrer or motion to strike. A party
may amend the pleading after the date for filing an opposition to the demurrer
or motion to strike, upon stipulation by the parties. The time for responding
to an amended pleading shall be computed from the date of service of the
amended pleading.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 472, subd. (a).)
Given that Plaintiff has timely filed the FAC, the demurrer
is MOOT.
Clerk of the Court to give notice.
Dated: February 13, 2025
|
¿ |
¿¿¿ |
|
¿ |
¿ Kerry Bensinger¿¿ ¿ Judge of the Superior Court¿ |