Judge: Kerry Bensinger, Case: 23STCV13985, Date: 2024-09-20 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV13985 Hearing Date: September 20, 2024 Dept: 31
Tentative Ruling
Judge Kerry Bensinger, Department 31
HEARING DATE: September 20, 2024 TRIAL DATE: March 17,
2025
CASE: Austin Gauntt v. General Motors, LLC
CASE NO.: 23STCV13985
MOTION
TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO DISCOVERY
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff
Austin Gauntt
RESPONDING PARTY: Defendant General
Motors, LLC
I. INTRODUCTION
This is a Song-Beverly action. On March 12, 2024, Plaintiff Austin Gauntt
filed this motion to compel Defendant General Motors, LLC to provide further
responses to Plaintiff’s Request for Production of Documents, Set One, Nos. 16-21. Plaintiff does not seek sanctions. There is a stipulated protective order in
place.[1]
On March 21, 2024, the parties participated in an Informal
Discovery Conference (IDC). After
conferring with counsel, the court directed counsel to meet and confer. Plaintiff was directed to file a Notice of
Outcome by April 4, 2024. The IDC was continued to April 11, 2024.
On April 4, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Outcome. As relevant here, the Notice stated the
parties came to the following agreement regarding Plaintiff’s discovery
requests:
The
parties agreed to narrow the definition of the “Engine Defect” to the following
terms: Reduced engine power; Engine wiring harness replacement; DTC P2C7A; DTC
P0191; DTC P0193; DTC P30de.
1.
Plaintiff’s Request for Production
of Customer Complaints The parties agreed that Defendant would produce customer
complaints pertaining to 2021 Chevrolet Silverados exhibiting the
aforementioned defect definition symptoms sold in California.
2.
Plaintiff’s Request for Production
of Warranty Claims The parties agreed that GM will produce warranty claims
pertaining to 2021 Chevrolet Silverados exhibiting the aforementioned defect
definition symptoms sold in California.
3.
Plaintiff’s Request for Emails of
the Lead Product Engineer The parties agreed that GM will produce documents
relied upon in generating applicable TSB #23-NA-138, including emails.
Plaintiff also stated in the Notice he would file a Notice
of Withdrawal for the April 11, 2024, IDC, and to continue this motion.
On April 4, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Withdrawal of
the April 11, 2024, IDC.
On April 10, 2024, Defendant filed an opposition.
Plaintiff did not file a reply.
II. DISCUSSION
On April 4, 2024, the parties reached an agreement regarding
Plaintiff’s production requests.
However, Plaintiff has not updated the court regarding the status of
this discovery dispute. The court will
hear from the parties whether this motion is moot.
III. CONCLUSION
The court will hear from the parties.
Dated: September 20,
2024
|
|
|
|
|
Kerry Bensinger Judge of the Superior Court |