Judge: Kerry Bensinger, Case: 24STCP03890, Date: 2025-04-16 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 24STCP03890 Hearing Date: April 16, 2025 Dept: 31
Tentative Ruling
Judge Kerry Bensinger, Department 31
HEARING DATE: April
16, 2025 TRIAL
DATE: N/A
CASE: The Boesch Law Group v. Sherrie B. Parker
CASE NO.: 24STCP03890
MOTION
FOR ORDER TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD
MOVING PARTY: Petitioner
Boesch Law Group
RESPONDING PARTY: No opposition
I. BACKGROUND
On November 13, 2024, the Honorable Kirk H. Nakamura (Ret.) (the
“Arbitrator”) issued a final arbitration award in favor of petitioner Boesch
Law Group (“Petitioner”) and against respondent Sherrie B. Parker (“Parker”) in
the principal sum of $320,851.81. The arbitration arose out of a dispute
regarding unpaid legal fees. .
On January 29, 2025, Petitioner filed this Motion for Order
to Confirm Arbitration Award against Parker.
The motion
is unopposed.
II. LEGAL STANDARD
Once arbitration is concluded,
“any arbitrator’s award is enforceable only when confirmed as a judgment of the
superior court.”¿ (O’Hare v. Municipal Resource Consultants (2003)
107¿Cal.App.4th 267, 278.)¿ Any of the parties may file a petition with the
court, which must then “confirm the award, correct and confirm it, vacate it,
or dismiss the petition.” (Code Civ. Proc.,¿§§¿1285, 1286; EHM
Productions, Inc. v. Starline Tours of Hollywood,¿Inc. (2018) 21
Cal.App.5th 1058, 1063.)¿“It is well settled that the scope of judicial review
of arbitration awards is extremely narrow.” (California Faculty Assn. v. Superior Court¿(1998)
63 Cal.App.4th 935, 943.)¿ “Neither the trial court, nor the appellate court,
may ‘review the merits of the dispute, the sufficiency of the evidence, or the
arbitrator’s reasoning, nor may we correct or review an award because of an
arbitrator’s legal or factual error, even if it appears on the award’s face.”¿
(EHM Productions, supra, at pp. 1063-64.)¿
III. DISCUSSION
Petitioner
seeks an order confirming the arbitration award issued on November 13, 2024.
An arbitrator’s award is enforceable only after being confirmed
by a court of law. (O’Hare, 107 Cal.App.4th at p. 278.)¿ “An award that
has not been confirmed or vacated has the same force and effect as a contract
in writing between the parties to the arbitration.”¿ (Code Civ. Proc., §
1287.6.)¿ Thus, the court must first evaluate and confirm the initial
arbitration award.¿
A.
Filing
Requirements (CCP § 1285.4)
Code of Civil Procedure section 1285.4 states: “A petition
under this chapter shall:
a.
Set forth the substance of or have
attached a copy of the agreement to arbitrate unless the petitioner denies the
existence of such an agreement.
b.
Set forth the names of the
arbitrators.
c.
Set forth or have attached a copy of
the award and the written opinion of the arbitrators, if any.”
Here, Petitioner submits the written Final Award issued by the
Arbitrator. (Pet., Ex. D.) Petitioner also submits a copy of the
arbitration agreement between the parties.
(Pet., Ex. A.) Petitioner has
satisfied the filing requirements.
¿¿
B.
Service of the Arbitration Award
& Timeliness of Petition (CCP §§ 1283.6, 1288, 1288.4)¿
¿
Code of Civil Procedure section 1283.6 provides that: “The
neutral arbitrator shall serve a signed copy of the award on each party
to the arbitration personally or by registered or certified mail or as provided
in the agreement.”¿ In addition, a party may seek a court judgment confirming
an arbitration award by filing and serving a petition no more than four years,
but not less than 10 days, after the award is served.¿ (Code Civ. Proc.,¿§§
1288, 1288.4.)¿
¿
Here, Petitioner submits a letter showing the Final Award
was served by JAMS on November 13, 2024.
(Pet., Ex. E.) Petitioner filed a verified petition to confirm the
award on December 2, 2024. The proof of
service attached to the verified petition indicates Parker was served with the
verified petition by certified mail on November 27, 2024. The motion is timely.
C.
Service of
the Petition, and Notice of Hearing (CCP § 1290.4)¿¿
¿
Code of Civil Procedure section 1290.4, the statute
governing proper service of this motion states, in pertinent part:¿¿
¿
“(a) A copy of the petition and a written notice of the time
and place of the hearing thereof and any other papers upon which the petition
is based shall be served in the manner provided in the arbitration agreement
for the service of such petition and notice.¿
¿
(b) If the arbitration agreement does not provide the manner
in which such service shall be made and the person upon whom service is to be
made has not previously appeared in the proceeding and has not previously been
served in accordance with this subdivision: ¶ (1) Service within this State
shall be made in the manner provided by law for the service of summons in an
action.”
¿
Here, Petitioner served Parker with a copy of the verified petition
by certified mail on November 27, 2024. Petitioner served Parker with notice
of hearing on January 29, 2025, by certified mail.¿ Petitioner demonstrates
that the petition and notice of hearing were properly served.¿
IV. CONCLUSION
Based on
the foregoing, the unopposed motion for order to confirm the arbitration award is
GRANTED.
Petitioner
to give notice.
DATED: April 15, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kerry Bensinger Judge of the Superior Court |
|