Judge: Kerry Bensinger, Case: 25STCP00534, Date: 2025-05-20 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 25STCP00534 Hearing Date: May 20, 2025 Dept: 31
Tentative Ruling
Judge Kerry Bensinger, Department 31
HEARING DATE: May
20, 2025 TRIAL DATE: N/A
CASE: SMC Specialty Finance, LLC v. Sparkhouse Media, LLC, et al.
CASE NO.: 25STCP00534
PETITION
TO CONFIRM CONTRACTUAL ARBITRATION AWARD
MOVING PARTY: Petitioner
SMC Specialty Finance, LLC
RESPONDING PARTY: No opposition
I. BACKGROUND
On January 21, 2025, arbitrator Laura C. Abrahamson (“Arbitrator”)
issued an arbitration award in favor of petitioner SMC Specialty Finance, LLC (“Petitioner”) and against respondents Sparkhouse
Media, LLC (“Sparkhouse”), Light of Mine Holdings Inc. (“Light of Mine”), Talal
Al-Abbar (“Al-Abbar”), and Karina Miller (“Miller”) (collectively,
“Respondents”) in the total sum of $4,900,536.01. The arbitration arose out of
a dispute regarding the unpaid balance on a loan to cover Respondents’ film
production costs.
On February 11, 2025, Petitioner filed a Petition to Confirm
Contractual Arbitration Award against Respondents.
The
petition is unopposed.
II. LEGAL STANDARD
Once arbitration is concluded,
“any arbitrator’s award is enforceable only when confirmed as a judgment of the
superior court.”¿ (O’Hare v. Municipal Resource Consultants (2003)
107¿Cal.App.4th 267, 278.)¿ Any of the parties may file a petition with the
court, which must then “confirm the award, correct and confirm it, vacate it,
or dismiss the petition.” (Code Civ. Proc.,¿§§¿1285, 1286; EHM
Productions, Inc. v. Starline Tours of Hollywood,¿Inc. (2018) 21
Cal.App.5th 1058, 1063.)¿“It is well settled that the scope of judicial review
of arbitration awards is extremely narrow.” (California Faculty Assn. v. Superior Court¿(1998)
63 Cal.App.4th 935, 943.)¿ “Neither the trial court, nor the appellate court,
may ‘review the merits of the dispute, the sufficiency of the evidence, or the
arbitrator’s reasoning, nor may we correct or review an award because of an
arbitrator’s legal or factual error, even if it appears on the award’s face.”¿
(EHM Productions, supra, at pp. 1063-64.)¿
III. DISCUSSION
Petitioner
seeks an order confirming the arbitration award issued on January 21, 2025.
An arbitrator’s award is enforceable only after being
confirmed by a court of law. (O’Hare, 107 Cal.App.4th at p. 278.)¿ “An
award that has not been confirmed or vacated has the same force and effect as a
contract in writing between the parties to the arbitration.”¿ (Code Civ. Proc.,
§ 1287.6.)¿ Thus, the court must first evaluate and confirm the initial
arbitration award.¿
A.
Filing
Requirements (CCP § 1285.4)
Code of Civil Procedure section 1285.4 states: “A petition
under this chapter shall:
a.
Set forth the substance of or have
attached a copy of the agreement to arbitrate unless the petitioner denies the existence
of such an agreement.
b.
Set forth the names of the
arbitrators.
c.
Set forth or have attached a copy of
the award and the written opinion of the arbitrators, if any.”
Here, Petitioner submits the written Final Award issued by the
Arbitrator. (Pet., Ex. 8(c).) Petitioners also submit a copy of the
arbitration agreement between the parties.
(Pet., Ex. 4(b).) Petitioner has
satisfied the filing requirements.
¿¿
B.
Service of the Arbitration Award
& Timeliness of Petition (CCP §§ 1283.6, 1288, 1288.4)¿
¿
Code of Civil Procedure section 1283.6 provides that: “The
neutral arbitrator shall serve a signed copy of the award on each party
to the arbitration personally or by registered or certified mail or as provided
in the agreement.”¿ In addition, a party may seek a court judgment confirming
an arbitration award by filing and serving a petition no more than four years,
but not less than 10 days, after the award is served.¿ (Code Civ. Proc.,¿§§
1288, 1288.4.)¿
¿
Here, Petitioner submits a letter showing the Final Award
was served by mail on January 21, 2025.
(Pet., Ex. 8(c), Proof of Service.) The motion is timely.
C.
Service of
the Petition, and Notice of Hearing (CCP § 1290.4)¿¿
¿
Code of Civil Procedure section 1290.4, the statute
governing proper service of this motion states, in pertinent part:¿¿
¿
“(a) A copy of the petition and a written notice of the time
and place of the hearing thereof and any other papers upon which the petition
is based shall be served in the manner provided in the arbitration agreement
for the service of such petition and notice.¿
¿
(b) If the arbitration agreement does not provide the manner
in which such service shall be made and the person upon whom service is to be
made has not previously appeared in the proceeding and has not previously been
served in accordance with this subdivision: ¶ (1) Service within this State
shall be made in the manner provided by law for the service of summons in an
action.”
¿
Here, Petitioner served Respondents with a copy of this petition
and notice of hearing on March 7, 2025, by certified mail.¿ (See Proof of
Service, dated 3/05/25.) Petitioner demonstrates
that the petition was properly served.¿
IV. CONCLUSION
Based on
the foregoing, the motion to confirm the contractual arbitration award is GRANTED.
Petitioner
to give notice.
DATED: May 19, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kerry Bensinger Judge of the Superior Court |
|