Judge: Kerry Bensinger, Case: 25STCP00534, Date: 2025-05-20 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 25STCP00534    Hearing Date: May 20, 2025    Dept: 31

Tentative Ruling

 

Judge Kerry Bensinger, Department 31

 

 

HEARING DATE:     May 20, 2025                                                 TRIAL DATE:  N/A

                                                          

CASE:                         SMC Specialty Finance, LLC v. Sparkhouse Media, LLC, et al.

 

CASE NO.:                 25STCP00534

 

 

PETITION TO CONFIRM CONTRACTUAL ARBITRATION AWARD

 

MOVING PARTY:               Petitioner SMC Specialty Finance, LLC

 

RESPONDING PARTY:     No opposition

 

 

I.          BACKGROUND

 

On January 21, 2025, arbitrator Laura C. Abrahamson (“Arbitrator”) issued an arbitration award in favor of petitioner SMC Specialty Finance, LLC (“Petitioner”) and against respondents Sparkhouse Media, LLC (“Sparkhouse”), Light of Mine Holdings Inc. (“Light of Mine”), Talal Al-Abbar (“Al-Abbar”), and Karina Miller (“Miller”) (collectively, “Respondents”) in the total sum of $4,900,536.01. The arbitration arose out of a dispute regarding the unpaid balance on a loan to cover Respondents’ film production costs. 

 

On February 11, 2025, Petitioner filed a Petition to Confirm Contractual Arbitration Award against Respondents.

 

            The petition is unopposed.

             

II.        LEGAL STANDARD

 

Once arbitration is concluded, “any arbitrator’s award is enforceable only when confirmed as a judgment of the superior court.”¿ (O’Hare v. Municipal Resource Consultants (2003) 107¿Cal.App.4th 267, 278.)¿ Any of the parties may file a petition with the court, which must then “confirm the award, correct and confirm it, vacate it, or dismiss the petition.”  (Code Civ. Proc.,¿§§¿1285, 1286; EHM Productions, Inc. v. Starline Tours of Hollywood,¿Inc. (2018) 21 Cal.App.5th 1058, 1063.)¿“It is well settled that the scope of judicial review of arbitration awards is extremely narrow.”  (California Faculty Assn. v. Superior Court¿(1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 935, 943.)¿ “Neither the trial court, nor the appellate court, may ‘review the merits of the dispute, the sufficiency of the evidence, or the arbitrator’s reasoning, nor may we correct or review an award because of an arbitrator’s legal or factual error, even if it appears on the award’s face.”¿ (EHM Productions, supra, at pp. 1063-64.)¿ 

 

III.      DISCUSSION

 

            Petitioner seeks an order confirming the arbitration award issued on January 21, 2025.

 

An arbitrator’s award is enforceable only after being confirmed by a court of law. (O’Hare, 107 Cal.App.4th at p. 278.)¿ “An award that has not been confirmed or vacated has the same force and effect as a contract in writing between the parties to the arbitration.”¿ (Code Civ. Proc., § 1287.6.)¿ Thus, the court must first evaluate and confirm the initial arbitration award.¿       

           

A.    Filing Requirements (CCP § 1285.4)  

 

Code of Civil Procedure section 1285.4 states: “A petition under this chapter shall: 

 

a.       Set forth the substance of or have attached a copy of the agreement to arbitrate unless the petitioner denies the existence of such an agreement. 

b.      Set forth the names of the arbitrators. 

c.       Set forth or have attached a copy of the award and the written opinion of the arbitrators, if any.” 

 

Here, Petitioner submits the written Final Award issued by the Arbitrator.  (Pet., Ex. 8(c).)  Petitioners also submit a copy of the arbitration agreement between the parties.  (Pet., Ex. 4(b).)  Petitioner has satisfied the filing requirements. 

¿¿ 

B.     Service of the Arbitration Award & Timeliness of Petition (CCP §§ 1283.6, 1288, 1288.4)¿ 

¿ 

Code of Civil Procedure section 1283.6 provides that: “The neutral arbitrator shall serve a signed copy of the award on each party to the arbitration personally or by registered or certified mail or as provided in the agreement.”¿ In addition, a party may seek a court judgment confirming an arbitration award by filing and serving a petition no more than four years, but not less than 10 days, after the award is served.¿ (Code Civ. Proc.,¿§§ 1288, 1288.4.)¿ 

¿ 

Here, Petitioner submits a letter showing the Final Award was served by mail on January 21, 2025.  (Pet., Ex. 8(c), Proof of Service.)  The motion is timely. 

 

C.     Service of the Petition, and Notice of Hearing (CCP § 1290.4)¿¿ 

¿ 

Code of Civil Procedure section 1290.4, the statute governing proper service of this motion states, in pertinent part:¿¿ 

¿ 

“(a) A copy of the petition and a written notice of the time and place of the hearing thereof and any other papers upon which the petition is based shall be served in the manner provided in the arbitration agreement for the service of such petition and notice.¿ 

¿ 

(b) If the arbitration agreement does not provide the manner in which such service shall be made and the person upon whom service is to be made has not previously appeared in the proceeding and has not previously been served in accordance with this subdivision: ¶ (1) Service within this State shall be made in the manner provided by law for the service of summons in an action.” 

¿ 

Here, Petitioner served Respondents with a copy of this petition and notice of hearing on March 7, 2025, by certified mail.¿ (See Proof of Service, dated 3/05/25.)  Petitioner demonstrates that the petition was properly served.¿ 

 

IV.        CONCLUSION

 

            Based on the foregoing, the motion to confirm the contractual arbitration award is GRANTED.

 

            Petitioner to give notice. 

                                   

                                                                       

DATED: May 19, 2025

 

 

 

 

 

  Kerry Bensinger

  Judge of the Superior Court

 

 




Website by Triangulus