Judge: Kerry Bensinger, Case: 25STCV05327, Date: 2025-05-06 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 25STCV05327 Hearing Date: May 6, 2025 Dept: 31
Tentative Ruling
Judge Kerry Bensinger, Department 31
HEARING DATE: May
6, 2025 TRIAL DATE: Not set
CASE: Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FS, As Owner Trustee of the
Residential Credit Opportunities Trust VI-A v. Martin Orozco, Trustee of Martin
Orozco Trust
CASE NO.: 25STCV05327
VERIFIED
PETITION FOR RELEASE OF MECHANIC’S LIENS
MOVING
PARTY: Petitioner Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FS, As Owner Trustee of the
Residential Credit Opportunities Trust VI-A
RESPONDING PARTY: No opposition
I. INTRODUCTION
This case concerns the property located at 2853 – 2855 ½
East 6th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90023 (the “Property”). Petitioner, Wilmington Savings Fund Society,
FS, As Owner Trustee of the Residential Credit Opportunities Trust VI-A, is the
owner of the Property. On May 10, 2024, Respondent,
Martin Orozco, Trustee of Martin Orozco Trust, recorded four mechanic’s liens
against the Property. The liens are
recorded in the Official Records of Los Angeles County as Document Nos.
20240310622, 20240310620, 20240310621, and 20240310619 (the “Mechanic’s Liens”).
On March 28,
2025, Petitioner filed this Verified Petition for release of the Mechanic’s
Liens against Respondent.
The petition is unopposed.
II. DISCUSSION
& LEGAL STANDARD
Petitioner
moves to have the Mechanic’s Liens recorded against the Property by Respondent
released. The Petition is brought pursuant to Civil Code section 8480, which
provides that the owner of property may petition the court for an order to
release the property from the claim of lien if the claimant has not commenced
an action to enforce the lien within the time provided in section 8460. (Civ. Code, § 8480, subd. (a).)
Section 8460 provides that “[t]he claimant shall commence
an action to enforce a lien within 90 days after recordation of the claim of
lien.” (Civ. Code, § 8460, subd. (a).) Section 8460 further provides that “[i]f
the claimant does not commence an action to enforce the lien within that time,
the claim of lien expires and is unenforceable.” (Civ. Code, § 8460, subd.
(a).) Section 8460 also provides that the 90-day time limit to commence an
action to enforce a lien does not apply if there was an agreement to extend
credit and a notice of that fact was recorded within 90 days after recordation
of the claim of lien or more than 90 days after recordation of the claim of
lien but before a purchaser or encumbrancer for value and in good faith
acquires rights in the property. (Civ., Code, § 8460, subd.
(b).)
A property owner may not petition for a release order until
he or she gives the claimant notice demanding that the claimant execute and
record a release of lien claim at least ten days before filing the petition.
(Civ. Code, § 8482.) Civil Code section 8484 requires that the petition for
release order be verified by the petitioner and allege the following:
(a) The
date of recordation of the claim of lien. A certified copy of the claim of lien
shall be attached to the petition.
(b) The
county in which the claim of lien is recorded.
(c) The
book and page or series number of the place in the official records where the
claim of lien is recorded.
(d) The
legal description of the property subject to the claim of lien.
(e)
Whether an extension of credit has been granted under Section 8460, if so to
what date, and that the time for commencement of an action to enforce the lien
has expired.
(f)
That the owner has given the claimant notice under Section 8482 demanding that
the claimant execute and record a release of the lien and that the claimant is
unable or unwilling to do so or cannot with reasonable diligence be found.
(g)
Whether an action to enforce the lien is pending.
(h)
Whether the owner of the property or interest in the property has filed for
relief in bankruptcy or there is another restraint that prevents the claimant
from commencing an action to enforce the lien.
Civil Code section 8486, subdivision (b) requires service
to “be made in the same manner as service of summons, or by certified or
registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested . . . .” (Civ. Code,
§ 8486, subd. (b).)
Here, Petitioner did not file a proof of service of the Verified
Petition and the Notice of the Hearing Date.
Petitioner has not satisfied the statutory requirements for
service.
III. CONCLUSION
Based on the foregoing, the Petition for Release of
Mechanics Liens is CONTINUED to June 9, 2025, to allow Petitioner to file and
serve this petition on Respondent, and to provide proof of service of the
same. Failure to do say may result in
the petition being denied.
Petitioner to give notice.
Dated: May 6, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
Kerry
Bensinger Judge of
the Superior Court |