Judge: Kerry Bensinger, Case: BC694072, Date: 2023-02-14 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: BC694072 Hearing Date: February 14, 2023 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
|
Plaintiffs, vs.
EDILIA
GARCIA, et al.,
Defendants.
|
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: EXPEDITED PETITION TO CONFIRM COMPROMISE MINOR
Dept.
27 1:30
p.m. |
I.
INTRODUCTION
This is an expedited petition to approve compromise of pending
action of three minors: Reyna Herrera age nine, Divina Herrera age seven, and
Dahlia Herrera age ten.
Claimant Reyna Herrera (“Reyna”), a minor, by and through
their parent and guardian ad litem, Marybel Lorenzo (“Petitioner”), has agreed
to release their claims against Defendant Edilia Garcia (“Defendant”) in
exchange for $900. If approved, $84.81
will be used to pay medical expenses, leaving a balance of $815.19 for
Claimant, to be deposited into a blocked account, subject to withdrawal only
upon authorization of the court.
Claimant Divina Herrera (“Divina”), a minor, by and through
their parent and guardian ad litem, Petitioner, has agreed to release their
claims against Defendant in exchange for $900. If approved, $19.19 will be used to pay
medical expenses, leaving a balance of $880.81 for Claimant, to be deposited
into a blocked account, subject to withdrawal only upon authorization of the
court.
Claimant Dahlia Herrera (“Dahlia”), a minor, by and through
their parent and guardian ad litem, Petitioner, has agreed to release their
claims against Defendant in exchange for $900. If approved, $231.36 will be
used to pay medical expenses and $15.00 will be used for non-medical expenses,
leaving a balance of $653.64 for Claimant, to be deposited into a blocked
account, subject to withdrawal only upon authorization of the court.
On November 22, 2022, the Court issued a minute order
continuing the hearings for the expedited petition to approve compromise of
pending action for Reyna, Divina, and Dahlia’s (hereinafter referred to
collectively as “Claimants”) to January 24, 2023. The Court continued the hearings because it
had reviewed the proposed settlement and found that it was not fair and
reasonable, as there was no “Attachment 13” providing any reasons for the
apportionment of settlement proceeds between Claimant and the other plaintiffs. The Court continued the hearing to allow
Petitioner to file supporting documents.
On January 24, 2023, the Court continued the instant
hearings to today, to allow Petitioner additional time to provide supporting
documents in accordance with the Court’s November 22, 2022 minute order.
/ / /
/ / /
/ / /
II.
LEGAL
STANDARD
Court
approval is required for all settlements of a minor’s claim. (Probate Code §§
3500, 3600, et seq.; Code of Civ. Proc. § 372.)
The conditions of an expedited petition are:
(1) The petitioner is represented by
an attorney authorized to practice in the courts of this state;
(2) The claim is not for damages for
the wrongful death of a person;
(3) Settlement proceeds will not be
placed in a trust;
(4)
There
are no unresolved liens to be satisfied from the proceeds of the settlement;
(5) Petitioner’s attorney did not become involved at the request of
Defendant or the insurance carrier;
(6)
Petitioner’s
attorney is not employed by nor associated with a Defendant or insurance
carrier in connect with the petition;¿
(7)
If
an action is filed, all Defendants have appeared and are participating in the
compromise OR the court has determined the settlement to be in good faith;¿
(8)
The settlement, exclusive of
interests and costs, is $50,000 or less¿
(9)
Or
if greater than $50,000, the amount payable is the insurance policy limits and
all¿proposed contributing parties would be
substantially unable to use assets other than the insurance policy limits; and
(10)
The
court does not otherwise order. (Cal Rules of Court, Rule
7.950.5.)
III.
DISCUSSION
As of February 9, 2023, Petitioner has
not filed any supporting paperwork in accordance with the Court’s November 23,
2023 minute order.
Accordingly, the expedited petitions to
approve compromise of pending action of minor Claimants are DENIED.
IV.
CONCLUSION
Petitioner’s expedited petitions to
approve compromise of pending action of minor Claimants are DENIED.
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org.
Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to
appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the
hearing and argue the matter. Unless you
receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume
that others might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from the
parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
Dated
this 14th day of February 2023
|
|
|
|
|
Hon.
Kerry Bensinger Judge of the Superior Court
|