Judge: Kerry Bensinger, Case: BC723462, Date: 2023-03-17 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: BC723462 Hearing Date: March 17, 2023 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
MICHAEL
GOLDEN, et al., Plaintiffs, vs.
ERIK
LIMON, et al.,
Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR ORDER TO DEEM THE TRUTH OF MATTERS SPECIFIED IN
PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS, SET THREE, ADMITTED
Dept.
27 1:30
p.m. March
17, 2023 |
I.
INTRODUCTION
On September 27, 2018, plaintiffs
Michael Golden and Samantha Mondrosch (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed this
wrongful death and survivor action against defendants Erik Limon (“Limon”) and
Jenevieve B. Hegedus (“Defendant”) arising from the death of Tracy E. Adams
(“Decedent”). Plaintiffs allege that
Decedent was riding her bicycle on September 6, 2017, when Limon hit her with
his vehicle and drove away without rendering assistance. Plaintiffs allege that Defendant then hit
Decedent a second time with her vehicle and also drove away without rendering
assistance.
On May 23, 2022, Plaintiffs served Requests
For Admission, Set Three, on Defendant.
On November 8, 2022, Plaintiffs filed
this motion for an order to deem admitted the truth of the matters in the
Requests for Admission, Set Three, against Defendant.
The motion is unopposed.
II.
LEGAL
STANDARD
If a party
to whom requests for admission are directed fails to serve a timely response,
the propounding party may move for an order that the truth of the matters
specified in the requests be deemed admitted.
(Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.280, subd. (b).)¿ In the context of a motion to deem requests for
admission admitted, it is mandatory the court impose monetary sanctions on the
party or attorney, or both, whose failure to serve a timely response to the
request necessitated the motion. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2030.290, subd. (c),
2033.280, subd. (c).)[1]
III.
DISCUSSION
Here, Plaintiffs’
counsel served the discovery request on Defendant on May 23, 2022. To date, Defendant has not responded to the
request. (Feldman Decl., ¶¶ 3-5.) As Plaintiffs properly served the discovery
request and Defendant failed to respond, the Court finds Plaintiffs are
entitled to an order deeming the Requests for Admission, Set Three, admitted
against Defendant.
IV.
CONCLUSION
Plaintiffs’ motion is granted.
Plaintiffs’ Requests for Admission, Set
Three, is deemed admitted against Defendant Jenevieve B. Hegedus.
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org.
Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to
appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the
hearing and argue the matter. Unless you
receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume
that others might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from the
parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
Dated this 17th day of March 2023
|
|
|
Hon.
Kerry Bensinger Judge of the Superior Court
|