Judge: Kevin C. Brazile, Case: 20STCV49866, Date: 2022-10-06 Tentative Ruling
Hearing Date: October 6, 2022
Case Name: Py v. Lithia Motors, Inc., et al.
Case No.: 20STCV17159
Matter: Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
Moving Party: Defendants Lithia Motors, Inc. and Lithia Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram of
Concord #273
Responding Party: Unopposed
Notice: OK
Ruling: The Petition is granted.
Defendants to give notice.
If counsel do not submit on the tentative, they are strongly
encouraged to appear by LACourtConnect rather than in person due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Defendants Lithia Motors, Inc. and Lithia Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram of Concord #273 seek to confirm an arbitration award issued by the Hon. Joe W. Hilberman on August 3, 2022, that is in favor of Defendants for an employment dispute alleged by Plaintiff.
Code Civ. Proc. § 1285 provides in relevant part, “Any party to an arbitration in which an award has been made may petition the court to confirm, correct or vacate the award.”
Code Civ. Proc. § 1285.4 states, “A petition under this chapter shall: (a) Set forth the substance of or have attached a copy of the agreement to arbitrate unless the petitioner denies the existence of such an agreement. (b) Set forth the names of the arbitrators. (c) Set forth or have attached a copy of the award and the written opinion of the arbitrators, if any.”
Code Civ. Proc. § 1286 states, “If a petition or response under this chapter is duly served and filed, the court shall confirm the award as made, whether rendered in this state or another state, unless in accordance with this chapter it corrects the award and confirms it as corrected, vacates the award or dismisses the proceeding.”
“The trial court has but four courses of conduct once a confirmation proceeding is initiated: 1) to confirm, 2) to correct and confirm, 3) to vacate, 4) to dismiss, where a respondent is not a party to the award or is not bound by the arbitration agreement.” (United Bhd. of Carpenters etc., Loc. 642 v. Demello (1972) 22 Cal.App.3d 838, 840.)
The Court will confirm the subject arbitration award because (1) there is no opposition; (2) Defendants have attached the Hon. Hilberman’s award, which was rendered on August 3, 2022; and (3) this Court acknowledged that there was an agreement to arbitrate when it compelled arbitration of this matter.
The Petition is granted.
Defendants to give notice.
If counsel do not submit on the tentative, they are strongly encouraged to appear by LACourtConnect rather than in person due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Case Number: 20STCV49866 Hearing Date: October 6, 2022 Dept: 20
Tentative Ruling
Judge Kevin C. Brazile