Judge: Kevin C. Brazile, Case: 22STCV39530, Date: 2023-05-04 Tentative Ruling

Hearing Date: May 4, 2023

Case Name: Gonzalez, et al. v. Salazar, et al.

Case No.: 22STCV20639

Matter: Demurrer

Moving Party: Plaintiff Maria Gonzalez

Responding Party: Unopposed

Notice: OK


Ruling: The Demurrer is overruled.


Moving party to give notice.


If counsel do not submit on the tentative, they are strongly 

encouraged to appear by LACourtConnect rather than in person due to the COVID-19 pandemic. 


 

On June 24, 2022, Plaintiffs Maria and Alma Gonzalez filed the verified Complaint.

On March 3, 2023, Defendants Jeanet Salazar, Julio Martinzez, and JATS Enterprises, Inc. filed a verified First Amended Answer (“FAA”) to the Complaint.

Plaintiff Maria Gonzalez now demurs to the affirmative defenses in the FAA for uncertainty and failure to state sufficient facts.

When considering demurrers, courts read the allegations liberally and in context, and “treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions or conclusions of fact or law.” (Serrano v. Priest (1971) 5 Cal.3d 584, 591.)  “A demurrer tests the pleadings alone and not the evidence or other extrinsic matters. Therefore, it lies only where the defects appear on the face of the pleading or are judicially noticed. The only issue involved in a demurrer hearing is whether the complaint, as it stands, unconnected with extraneous matters, states a cause of action.”  (Hahn v. Mirda¿(2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747.)  It is error “to sustain a demurrer without leave to amend if the plaintiff shows there is a reasonable possibility any defect identified by the defendant can be cured by amendment.”  (Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital Dist.¿(1992) 2 Cal.4th 962, 967.)

The FAA’s affirmative defenses are pled in typical fashion, and any uncertainty can be resolved through discovery.  (See Khoury v. Maly's of California Inc. (1993) 14 Cal.App.4th 612, 616.)  The Demurrer is overruled.

Moving party to give notice.

If counsel do not submit on the tentative, they are strongly encouraged to appear by LACourtConnect rather than in person due to the COVID-19 pandemic.



Case Number: 22STCV39530    Hearing Date: May 4, 2023    Dept: 20

Tentative Ruling

Judge Kevin C. Brazile

Department 20