Judge: Latrice A. G. Byrdsong, Case: 23STUD07666, Date: 2024-05-23 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 23STUD07666    Hearing Date: May 23, 2024    Dept: 25

Hearing Date:                         Thursday, May 23, 2024

Case Name:                             PRIME/PARK LABREA TITLEHOLDER, LLC v. LEVY

Case No.:                                23STUD07666

Motion:                                   to Reclassify (Walker Motion) from Limited Civil to Unlimited Civil Jurisdiction

Moving Party:                         Plaintiff Prime/Park LaBrea Titleholder, LLC

Responding Party:                   Unopposed

Notice:                                    OK


 

 

Tentative Ruling:                    Plaintiff Prime/Park LaBrea Titleholder, LLC’s Motion for Reclassification is GRANTED.

 

The Court orders this action reclassified from the Civil Limited Jurisdiction to the Civil Unlimited Jurisdiction Court, upon payment of the appropriate reclassification fees.

 

 Plaintiff is ordered to pay the appropriate reclassification fees within ten  (10) days of this Court’s order.

 


 

BACKGROUND

 

On June 26, 2023, Plaintiff Prime/Park LaBrea Titleholder, LLC (“Plaintiff”), filed a Complaint against Defendant Roanna Levy (“Defendant”) for Unlawful Detainer.

 

On April 17, 2024, Plaintiff filed the instant Motion to Reclassify Limited Action to Unlimited Action. A timely opposition was due on May 10, 2024. As of May 21, 2024, no opposition has been filed.

 

 

MOVING PARTY POSITION

 

            Plaintiff argues the parties have already stipulated to reclassification in their Unlawful Detainer Stipulation and Judgment filed on March 13, 2024. Specifically, Plaintiff asserts due to the other monetary obligation on the tenancy ledger, the total outstanding debt due to Plaintiff was $79,037.40. As such, Plaintiff contends the Stipulation included a term to reclassify this matter to unlimited jurisdiction. Furthermore, Plaintiff contends Defendant has already complied with the vacate date therein, so possession is no longer at issue. Last, Plaintiff asserts assuming the motion is granted, it seeks leave to pay the reclassification fees following the hearing because it was not able to pay the reclassification fee at the time the Stipulation was filed.

 

OPPOSITION

 

None filed as of 5/21/24.

 

REPLY

 

None filed as of 5/21/24.

 

 

ANALYSIS

 

 

I. Motion to Reclassify Limited Action to Unlimited Jurisdiction

A.    Legal Standard

“The plaintiff, cross-complainant, or petitioner may file a motion for reclassification within the time allowed for that party to amend the initial pleading. The defendant or cross-defendant may file a motion for reclassification within the time allowed for that party to respond to the initial pleading. The court, on its own motion, may reclassify a case at any time. A motion for reclassification does not extend the moving party’s time to amend or answer or otherwise respond. The court shall grant the motion and enter an order for reclassification, regardless of any fault or lack of fault, if the case has been classified in an incorrect jurisdictional classification.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 403.040, subd. (a).)

“If a party files a motion for reclassification after the time for that party to amend that party’s initial pleading or to respond to a complaint, cross-complaint, or other initial pleading, the court shall grant the motion and enter an order for reclassification only if both of the following conditions are satisfied: (1) The case is incorrectly classified…[and] (2) The moving party shows good cause for not seeking reclassification earlier.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 403.040, subd. (b)(1)-(2).)

B.  Discussion

Here, Plaintiff moves for an order reclassifying the instant case from limited jurisdiction to unlimited jurisdiction. This motion is made on the grounds that Plaintiff’s damages in this matter have exceeded the $35,000.00 threshold amount for a limited jurisdiction case. Initially, the damages sought by Plaintiff against Defendant was for $5,870.00. However, due to other monetary obligations on the tenancy ledger, Defendant’s total outstanding debt owed to Plaintiff is $79,037.40. Furthermore, possession is no longer at issue, so Plaintiff may amend the initial pleading per Civil Code section 1952.3, subdivision (a)(1) and in accordance with the reclassification statute. Finally, the parties have stipulated to the reclassification of this matter per Code of Civil Procedure section 403.050, subdivision (a).

Therefore, the Court finds that reclassification of the instant action is proper.

II.        Conclusion

           

            Accordingly, Plaintiff Prime/LaBrea Titleholder, LLC’s Motion to Reclassify this action from the Civil Limited Jurisdiction to the Civil Unlimited Civil Jurisdiction Court   is GRANTED.

 

Plaintiff/Moving party is ordered to pay the appropriate reclassification fees within ten (10) days of this Court’s order.

 

The Trial Setting Conference is hereby taken off calendar.

 

            Moving party to give notice.