Judge: Laura A. Seigle, Case: 22STCV17273, Date: 2023-04-24 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV17273 Hearing Date: April 24, 2023 Dept: 15
[TENTATIVE] ORDERS RE MOTIONS IN LIMINE
Defendants’ MIL No. 1
Defendant
Greene, Tweed & Co. moves to exclude testimony and videos from William
Longo and John Templin about work simulations and installing and removing
materials because the simulations and videos do not show conditions similar to John
Lewis’ exposure. Defendant argues the simulations
and videos took place in small sealed chambers, used improper testing methods,
and will be confusing to the jury because the conditions are so different. Whether the testing methods used are
appropriate “goes to the weight and not the admissibility of the
opinions.” (Strobel v. Johnson &
Johnson (2021) 70 Cal.App.5th 796, 811-812.) At trial, Defendant can cross-examine the
experts about the similarities and differences of Lewis’ exposure to the
conditions shown in the videos and argue the jury should give the videos no
weight because of the different conditions.
Defendant
filed a declaration attaching numerous rulings by other courts, including
federal courts and other state courts, excluding the evidence. The exclusion of expert evidence is governed
by different law in federal court and other states. Many of the exhibits are impossible to read
because they have been copied so many times.
The
motion is denied without prejudice to objections at trial.
Defendants’ MIL No. 1
Defendant
The William Powell Company seeks to exclude all evidence and claims of exposure
not previously disclosed in discovery.
Pursuant to the July 8, 2022 CMO, this motion is deemed made and
denied. Defendant did not show good
cause to depart from that order. Therefore,
the motion is denied without prejudice to objections at trial.
Regarding
the late produced blueprint, Defendant can take John Lewis’ deposition for a
total of two hours to ask solely about the blueprint, to be completed by May 4,
2023.
The
moving party is to give notice.