Judge: Laura A. Seigle, Case: 23STCV15780, Date: 2023-10-27 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV15780 Hearing Date: October 27, 2023 Dept: 15
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE MOTION FOR PREFERENCE
On July 6, 2023, Plaintiff Jeanne Robinson filed her action for personal
injury caused by asbestos exposure. On October 3, 2023, Plaintiff filed this
motion for trial preference under Code of Civil Procedure section 36,
subdivision (a).
A party who is over 70 years old may petition the court for a preference, which the court shall grant if it makes both of the following findings: (1) the party has a substantial interest in the action as a whole; and (2) the health of the party is such that a preference is necessary to prevent prejudicing the party’s interest in the litigation. (Code Civ. Proc., § 36, subd. (a).) An affidavit submitted in support of a motion for preference under this subdivision may be signed by the attorney for the party seeking preference based upon information and belief as to the medical diagnosis and prognosis of any party. (Id., § 36.5.)
Defendants argue that Mr. Willick and Dr. Cameron’s declarations do not
provide information as to Plaintiff’s current medical condition, treatment, or
short-term prognosis. (Chanel’s Opposition at p.4.)
The court finds that Johnson
has a substantial interest in the action as a whole. The evidence shows she is in poor health, has very little stamina and
energy, and is likely to experience continued decline. (Willick Decl., ¶¶ 7-9; Cameron Decl., ¶¶
13-14.) Granting preference here is
necessary to ensure Plaintiff’s ability to participate in the litigation and trial
while her health permits.
Plaintiff’s motion for
trial setting preference is GRANTED. The
parties are to meet and confer on a trial setting order. The trial is scheduled for February 20, 2024 at
9:00 a.m. The final status conference is
scheduled for February 5, 2024 at 9:00 a.m. A status conference regarding the trial
setting order is set for November 8, 2023 at 9:00 a.m.
The moving party is to
order to give notice.