Judge: Lee S. Arian, Case: 20STCV02815, Date: 2023-10-27 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV02815 Hearing Date: October 27, 2023 Dept: 27
Tentative Ruling
Judge Kerry Bensinger, Department 27
HEARING DATE: October
27, 2023 TRIAL
DATE: Vacated
CASE: Patricia Knox v. Rosalind Wesey, et al.
CASE NO.: 20STCV02815
PETITION
TO CONFIRM COMPROMISE WITH SPECIAL NEEDS TRUST
MOVING PARTY: Petitioner
Danny Barnes
RESPONDING PARTY: No opposition
Claimant,
Patricia Ann Knox, a person with a disability, by and through her guardian ad
litem, Petitioner, Danny Barnes, has agreed to settle her claims against Defendants Rosalind and
Akindeji Wesey in exchange for $300,000.
If approved, $15,549.38 will be used for medical expenses, $120,000 will
be used for attorney’s fees, $67,886.36 will be used for other expenses,
leaving a balance of $112,113.64, to be paid or transferred to the trustee of a
special needs trust established under Probate Code section 3604 for the benefit
of the Claimant.
After
the Probate Department reviewed the Petition, the Court issued a ruling on
August 4, 2023. The Court could not
approve the Petition because Petitioner sought to establish a “pooled” special
needs trust but provided only the joinder agreement and illegible “screenshots”
of other documents. The Court continued
the Petition and ordered Petitioner to file the master agreement, joinder
agreement, and all relevant documents, as well as legible copies of any
document relevant to the creation of the proposed trust.
On
August 7, 2023, Petitioner lodged the proposed trust instrument and related
documents. The proposed trust instrument
and related documents were reviewed on September 21, 2023. However, the Court could not approve the
Petition for defects in the joinder agreement and proposed order.
On
October 12, 2023, Petitioner filed a second amended joinder agreement and
amended proposed order.
The
Probate Department has reviewed the amended joinder agreement and proposed
order. The proposed trust instrument now
meets the requirements pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 7.903(c) and
Los Angeles Superior Court rule 4.116(b).
The
Court makes the following findings.
·
The
settlement and request for attorney’s fees to be fair and reasonable.
·
Petitioner
had substantiated the request to use $67,886.36 of the settlement to pay for
other expenses.
As
required by Probate Code section 3604, subdivision (b), the Court makes the
following findings:[1]
1.
Claimant has a disability that substantially impairs her ability to provide for
her own care or custody and constitutes a substantial handicap.
2.
Claimant is likely to have special needs that will not be met without the
trust.
3. The money to be paid to the trust does not
exceed the amount that appears reasonably necessary to meet Claimant’s special
needs.
In sum, the proposed may be created and
funded.
Accordingly, the Petition is GRANTED. The Court will require the trustee to submit
$130,000 bond to Department 27 of Spring Street Courthouse. The Court sets the first trust accounting for
December 27, 2024.
Additionally,
the Court sets an OSC re: Status of Probate Case on December 27, 2023 at 8:30
a.m. in Department 27 of Spring Street Courthouse to determine if Petitioner
has filed proof in the civil case that the trust file has been opened in the
Probate Department of the Los Angeles Superior Court.
Moving party to give notice.
Dated: October 27,
2023 __________________________________
Kerry
Bensinger
Judge
of the Superior Court
Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an
email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating intention to submit on
the tentative as directed by the instructions provided on the court website at
www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative
and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless
appear at the hearing and argue the matter. Unless you receive a
submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume that others
might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive
emails from the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and
there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion,
adopt the tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.