Judge: Lee S. Arian, Case: 20STCV15719, Date: 2025-06-09 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV15719 Hearing Date: June 9, 2025 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF
LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
INTERINSURANCE EXCHANGE OF THE AUTOMOBILE
CLUB, Plaintiff, vs. DAVID BEDRAN, et al., Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
) |
[TENTATIVE RULING] Dept. 27 1:30 p.m. June 9, 2025 |
The Court notes several deficiencies with the motion. First, Defendant
does not cite any legal authority under which he seeks relief. Although
Defendant makes certain statements regarding why he believes relief is
warranted, those assertions are not supported by a declaration or any
documentary evidence.
Second, and more importantly, the judgment was entered more than three
years ago, on March 25, 2022. Therefore, relief under the California Code of
Civil Procedure is foreclosed. For example, relief under Code of Civil
Procedure section 473, subdivision (b), is unavailable because the motion is
filed more than 6 months from the judgment. While Defendant appears to rely on
section 473.5, which permits relief “when service of a summons has not resulted
in actual notice to a party in time to defend the action and a default or
default judgment has been entered against him or her” (Code Civ. Proc., §
473.5, subd. (a)) that statute requires the motion be filed within the earlier
of (i) two years after entry of default judgment or (ii) 180 days after service
of written notice of the default or default judgment. (Ibid.) Because more than
three years have passed since entry of judgment, section 473.5 does not apply.
Moreover, the proof of substituted service filed on June 10, 2020,
indicates that Defendant was served at 12942 Walby Way, North Hollywood, CA
91606, via substituted service on Katherine Bedran, who shares Defendant’s last
name and was identified as a relative or co-resident. Service occurred on May
23, 2020. Defendant’s moving papers do not state when he became homeless or that
he had no connection to the Walby Way address at the time of service. As such, he fails to show that the address was
not his dwelling house, usual place of abode, usual place of business, or usual
mailing address as required for valid substituted service
Accordingly, the motion is denied.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at
SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating intention
to submit on the tentative as directed by
the instructions provided on the court’s website at www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that if you submit on the
tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may
nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the matter. Unless you receive a submission from all
other parties in the matter, you should assume that others might appear at the
hearing to argue. If the Court does not
receive emails from the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling
and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion,
adopt the tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Lee S. Arian Judge of the Superior Court |