Judge: Lee S. Arian, Case: 20STCV46578, Date: 2024-02-14 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV46578 Hearing Date: February 14, 2024 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
|
Plaintiffs, vs. Defendant. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: Dept.
27 1:30
p.m. February
14, 2024 |
Claimant
Court approval is required for all
settlements of a minor’s claim. (Probate
Code §§ 3500, 3600, et seq.; Code
Civ. Proc. § 372.) The Court has
reviewed the proposed settlement and finds that it is fair and reasonable. Further, the requested attorney’s fees, which
amounts to approximately 25% of the total settlement, is fair and reasonable.
The unopposed Petition to approve
minor’s compromise is GRANTED.
The Court sets an OSC for ________________
for proof of deposit. (Cal. Rules of
Court, Rule 7.953(a).) If an
acknowledgement of receipt by the financial institution is filed before that
date, no appearance will be required.
Per California Rules of Court, Rule
7.952, Petitioner and Claimant must appear at the hearing, unless the Court
finds good cause to excuse their appearance.
The Court finds that Claimant’s appearance is not necessary, but will
require Petitioner to appear.
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org.
Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to
appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the
hearing and argue the matter. Unless you
receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume
that others might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from the
parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
Dated this
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Lee S. Arian Judge of the Superior Court |
[1] Petitioner’s counsel indicates
that Petitioner has changed her last name to Allin. (Ercolani Decl., ¶ 4.)
[2] The Court notes that paragraph
16 of the Petition totals numbers on the left side of the column in a way that is
somewhat confusing. For example, paragraph 12, subdivisions (a)(4) and (a)(5)
list medical expenses for reimbursement as totaling $15,614.53 and statutory or
contractual liens as $6,457.58, but paragraph 16, subdivision (b) lists only
$3,124.25. (Petition, ¶¶ 12, subd.
(a), 16.) The non-medical expenses
section under paragraph 16, subdivision (d) lists $18,947.86, but paragraph 13,
subdivision (b), lists only $2,604.45 in non-medical expenses. (Petition, ¶¶13, subd. (b), 16.) Petitioner also seems to have combined
litigation expenses with the attorney’s fees in paragraph 16, subdivision
(c). (Petition, ¶ 16, subd. (c).) Nevertheless, the net balance of proceeds
payable to Claimant still adds up to $106,573.44, which matches the Court’s
calculations.