Judge: Lee S. Arian, Case: 21STCV33509, Date: 2024-01-29 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV33509 Hearing Date: January 29, 2024 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
|
Plaintiff, vs. CMI
TRANSPORTATION LLC, et al., Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE COMPLAINT-IN-INTERVENTION Dept.
27 1:30
p.m. January
29, 2024 |
MOVING PARTY: Proposed Plaintiff in Intervention Ace
American Insurance Co. c/o/ Broadspire, a subrogee of Inland Services, Inc. (“AAI”)
RESPONDING PARTY: Unopposed
I.
INTRODUCTION
On
September 10, 2021, Plaintiff Luis A. Orellana (“Plaintiff”), filed this action
against Defendants CMI Transportation LLC, Luis F. Velasquez, and Does 1 to 20
(collectively “Defendants”) alleging causes of action for: (1) general
negligence and (2) motor vehicle. The complaint arises from a September 10,
2019 motor vehicle collision.
On
September 21, 2023, Proposed Plaintiff in Intervention Ace American Insurance
Co. c/o/ Broadspire, a subrogee of Inland Services, Inc. (“AAI”) filed and
served the instant motion for leave to file a complaint-in-intervention (the
“Motion”). The Motion is unopposed.
The
Motion is made on the grounds AAI insures Plaintiff’s employer, Inland
Services, Inc., for workers’ compensation insurance. (Memorandum of Points and
Authorities, 1:24-25.) AAI asserts Plaintiff applied for and filed a workers’
compensation claim, pursuant to which AAI paid current total benefits of
$28,047.21. (Memorandum of Points and Authorities, 2:1-2.)
II.
LEGAL
STANDARD
“The court shall, upon timely
application, permit a nonparty to intervene in the action or proceeding if . .
. the following condition[] is satisfied: (A) A provision of law confers an
unconditional right to intervene.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 387, subd. (d)(1)(A).) “If
either the employee or the employer brings an action against such third person,
he shall forthwith give the other a copy of the complaint by personal service
of certified mail.” (Lab. Code, § 3853.) “If the action is brought by either
the employer or the employee, the other may, at any time before trial on the
facts, join as party plaintiff or shall consolidate his action, if brought
independently.” (Ibid.)
“If an employee injured in the course of his
or her employment by a third party commences an action against that third
party, Labor Code section 3853 grants the employee’s employer an unconditional
right to intervene in the action at any time before trial on the facts.” (Mar
v. Sakti Internat. Corp. (1992) 9 Cal.App.4th 1780, 1782.)
III.
DISCUSSION
In support of the Motion, counsel for AAI
declares that AAI insured Inland Services, Inc. for workers’ compensation
insurance at the time of the subject incident on September 10, 2019. (Sandoval Decl.,
¶ 2.) Plaintiff was injured in the course and scope of his employment, and
Plaintiff applied for and filed a workers’ compensation claim, pursuant to
which AAI has paid total benefits of $28,047.21 to date. (Id., ¶¶ 5-6.)
By virtue of its payments, the terms of the policy, the agreement of the
insured employer, and principles of equity, AAI has become, and is subrogated
to all rights, remedies, and causes of action accruing to its insured employer
and Plaintiff, and against Defendants. (Id., ¶ 8.)
The Court finds that AAI has provided a
basis to intervene in this action. Labor Code section 3853 grants an employer a
right to intervene; Labor Code section 3850 defines “employer” to include an
insurer.[1]
Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the
Motion.
IV.
CONCLUSION
The Motion is GRANTED.
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org.
Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to
appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the
hearing and argue the matter. Unless you
receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume
that others might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from the
parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
Dated this 29th day of January 2024
|
|
|
|
|
Hon.
Lee S. Arian Judge of the Superior Court |
[1] AAI
fails to cite to section 3850. The definition
of “employer” in that section is the basis upon which AAI has statutory
authority to intervene; accordingly, one would think that would be referenced
in the motion to explain why the reference to “employer” in section 3853
includes AAI.