Judge Lee S. Arian, Case Number: 22STCV00794, Date: 2024-05-21 Tentative Ruling

Judge: Lee S. Arian, Case: 22STCV00794, Date: 2024-05-21 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 22STCV00794 Hearing Date: May 21, 2024 Dept: 27

Hon. Lee S. Arian, Dept 27

MOTIONS TO COMPEL INITIAL RESPONSES TO FORM INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION, SET ONE; MOTION TO DEEM CONTENTS OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS, SET ONE, ADMITTED; REQUESTS FOR SANCTIONS

Hearing Date: 5/21/24

CASE NO./NAME: 22STCV00794 DAN GAO, et al. vs JULIAN JOSEPH NOUR

Moving Party: Plaintiff Dan Goa

Responding Party: Defendant Julian Joseph Nour

Notice: Sufficient

Ruling: MOTIONS TO COMPEL INITIAL RESPONSES TO FORM INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION, SET ONE; MOTION TO DEEM CONTENTS OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS, SET ONE, ADMITTED; REQUESTS FOR SANCTIONS ARE GRANTED

Background

On January 3, 2023, Plaintiff DAN GOA propounded his Request for Admissions, Form Interrogatories, Set One, and Request for Productions, Set One on Defendant JULIAN JOSEPH NOUR. The parties have communicated, and Plaintiff set a final deadline for Defendant to respond by May 12, 2023. Subsequently, Plaintiff notified the new attorney of record of the extended deadline to respond by February 29, 2024. To date, Defendant has not provided the requested discovery responses. Thus, Plaintiff moves the Court to deem the contents of his Request for Admissions, Set One, admitted and to compel Defendant to produce initial responses to his Form Interrogatories, Set One, and Requests for Production, Set One.

Legal Standard

1. Requests for Production and Interrogatories

A plaintiff may make a demand for production of documents and propound interrogatories without leave of court at any time 10 days after the service of the summons on, or appearance by, the party to whom the demand is directed, whichever occurs first. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.020, subd. (b); Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.020, subd. (b).) The demand for production of documents is not limited by number, but the request must comply with the formatting requirements in Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.030. A party may propound 35 specially prepared interrogatories that are relevant to the subject matter of the pending action and any additional number of official form interrogatories that are relevant to the subject matter of the pending action. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.030, subd. (a)(1) - (a)(2).)

The party whom the request is propounded upon is required to respond within 30 days after service of a demand, but the parties are allowed to informally agree to an extension and confirm any such agreement in writing. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.260, subd. (a); Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.260, subd. (a); Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.270, subd. (a) - (b); Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.270, subd. (a) - (b).)

¿¿¿¿¿

If a party fails to timely respond to a request for production or interrogatories, the party to whom the request is directed waives any right to exercise the option to produce writings under Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.230, and waives any objection, including one based on privilege or on the protection for work product. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.300, subd. (a); Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290, subd. (a).)¿¿The party propounding the discovery requests may move for an order compelling responses. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.300, subd. (b); Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290, subd. (b).) Unlike a motion to compel further discovery responses, a motion to compel initial discovery responses does not have any meet and confer requirements.

¿¿¿¿

Code of Civil Procedure section 2023.030, subdivision (a) provides, in pertinent part, that the court may impose a monetary sanction on a party engaging in the misuse of the discovery process to pay the reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, incurred by anyone as a result of that conduct. A misuse of the discovery process includes failing to respond or submit to an authorized method of discovery. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2023.010, subd. (d).)¿¿¿A court has discretion to fix the amount of reasonable monetary sanctions. (Cornerstone Realty Advisors, LLC v. Summit Healthcare Reit, Inc. (2020) 56 Cal.App.5th 771, 791.)

2. Request for Admissions

“Any party may obtain discovery . . . by a written request that any other party to the action admit the genuineness of specified documents, or the truth of specified matters of fact, opinion relating to fact, or application of law to fact. A request for admission may relate to a matter that is in controversy between the parties.”¿ CCP § 2033.010.¿ “Within 30 days after service of requests for admission, the party to whom the requests are directed shall serve the original of the response to them on the requesting party, and a copy of the response on all other parties who have appeared ....”¿ CCP § 2033.250(a).

¿¿

If a party to whom request for admissions are served fails to provide a timely response, the party to whom the request was directed waives any objections, including based on privilege or the work product doctrine. CCP § 2033.280(a). The requesting party can move for an order that the genuineness of any documents and the truth of any matters specified in the request be deemed admitted, as well as for monetary sanctions. CCP § 2033.280(b). The court shall issue this order unless the party to whom the request was made serves a response in substantial compliance prior to the hearing on the motion. CCP § 2033.280(c). Unlike a motion to compel further discovery responses, a motion to deem RFA admitted does not have any meet and confer requirements.

Analysis

It is undisputed that Defendant did not serve timely initial discovery responses. No opposition was filed, nor were any documents presented that indicated discovery responses had been served prior to the hearing. Consequently, the present motions are GRANTED. Defendant is ORDERED to submit verified responses to Plaintiff’s Requests for Production, Set One, and Form Interrogatories, Set One, without objections within 20 days from today. Additionally, the contents of Plaintiff’s Requests for Admissions, Set One, are deemed admitted.

Defendant’s non-responsiveness prompted Plaintiff to file the present motion and incur attorney’s fees. Plaintiff requests sanctions in the amount of $850.00 per motion. Considering the simplicity of the issues and the absence of an opposition, the Court exercises its discretion and set the sanction amount to $1500 for all three motions. Consequently, the Court sanctions Defendant in the amount of $1500. Defendant and his counsel are ORDERED, jointly and severally, to pay sanctions of $1500 to Plaintiff within 20 days of today’s date.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:

If a party intends to submit on this tentative ruling,¿the party must send an email to the court at¿sscdept27@lacourt.org¿with the Subject line “SUBMIT” followed by the case number.¿ The body of the email must include the hearing date and time, counsel’s contact information, and the identity of the party submitting.

Unless¿all¿parties submit by email to this tentative ruling, the parties should arrange to appear remotely (encouraged) or in person for oral argument.¿ You should assume that others may appear at the hearing to argue.

If the parties neither submit nor appear at hearing, the Court may take the motion off calendar or adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court.¿ After the Court has issued a tentative ruling, the Court may prohibit the withdrawal of the subject motion.