Judge: Lee S. Arian, Case: 22STCV12200, Date: 2025-01-30 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV12200 Hearing Date: January 30, 2025 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF
LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
JAMES RUSSELL Plaintiff, vs. 640 SAN JULIAN ST APARTMENTS, et al Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE RULING] MOTION FOR
RELIEF IS GRANTED Dept. 27 1:30 p.m. January 30, 2024 |
On
November 5, 2024, the Court dismissed this action because no Entry of Default
or Proof of Service had been filed, and there were no appearances by or for
Plaintiff on that date. Plaintiff now moves for mandatory relief under Code of
Civil Procedure § 473(b).
“The
mandatory relief provision of section 473(b) is a ‘narrow exception to the
discretionary relief provision for default judgments and dismissals.’
[Citation.] Its purpose ‘was to alleviate the hardship on parties who lose
their day in court due solely to an inexcusable failure to act on the part of
their attorneys.’ [Citation.] An application for mandatory relief must be filed
within six months of entry of judgment and be in proper form, accompanied by an
attorney's sworn affidavit attesting to his or her mistake, inadvertence,
surprise, or neglect. [Citation.] The defaulting party ‘must submit sufficient
evidence that the default was actually caused by the attorney's error.
[Citation.] If the prerequisites for the application of the mandatory relief provision
of section 473, subdivision (b) exist, the trial court does not have discretion
to refuse relief.’” (Henderson v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (2010)
187 Cal.App.4th 215, 226.)
Plaintiff’s
motion was filed on November 18, 2024, within the six-month period required by
statute. The dismissal order falls within the narrow exception for mandatory
relief. Plaintiff’s counsel has submitted a sworn declaration attesting to her
mistake or neglect. Counsel’s failure to file the Proof of Service and Entry of
Default, as well as the failure to appear at the hearing, directly resulted in
the dismissal of the case. As all statutory requirements for mandatory relief
under section 473(b) have been met, the motion is granted.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at
SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating intention
to submit on the tentative as directed by
the instructions provided on the court’s website at www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that if you submit on the
tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may
nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the matter. Unless you receive a submission from all
other parties in the matter, you should assume that others might appear at the
hearing to argue. If the Court does not
receive emails from the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling
and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion,
adopt the tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Lee S. Arian Judge of the Superior Court |