Judge: Lee S. Arian, Case: 22STCV12672, Date: 2025-04-16 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV12672 Hearing Date: April 16, 2025 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF
LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
NATHANIEL BOWEN, Plaintiff, vs. RONNELL ABAEKOBE, et al. Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE RULING] MOTION TO CONTINUE IS DENIED Dept. 27 1:30 p.m. April 16, 2025 |
On June 3, 2023, Plaintiff filed this action. Trial is currently set for
May 27, 2025. Defendant alleges that written discovery remains outstanding and
that no depositions have been taken in this case. Defendant now moves to
continue the trial date to December 9, 2025. No opposition has been filed.
Defendant states that the parties have been delayed in engaging in
meaningful investigation and discovery due to “unanticipated issues on both
sides.” (Decl. of BG, ¶ 4.) However, no further detail is provided as to what
those unanticipated issues are. This case was filed on June 3, 2023, and
Defendant filed an answer on July 31, 2023, meaning the parties have had approximately
two years to conduct discovery, including depositions. Yet, despite this time,
and without disclosing the nature of the alleged issues to the Court, written
discovery and depositions remain incomplete.
Furthermore, under California Rules of Court, rule 3.714, cases of this
type are expected to be resolved within 24 months. A trial date in December
2025 would exceed that timeline.
With no basis for the delay in discovery having been provided to the
Court, the moving party has failed to establish good cause for a
continuance. And, no reason appears to
exist to make this case an exception to the general rule that cases are to be
completed within 2 years of filing. Accordingly,
the Motion to Continue is denied.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at
SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating intention
to submit on the tentative as directed by
the instructions provided on the court’s website at www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that if you submit on the
tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may
nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the matter. Unless you receive a submission from all
other parties in the matter, you should assume that others might appear at the
hearing to argue. If the Court does not
receive emails from the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling
and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion,
adopt the tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Lee S. Arian Judge of the Superior Court |