Judge: Lee S. Arian, Case: 22STCV12953, Date: 2024-03-20 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 22STCV12953    Hearing Date: March 20, 2024    Dept: 27

Complaint: 4/18/22

 

Hon. Lee S. Arian¿¿¿¿ 

Department 27¿¿¿¿ 

Tentative Ruling¿¿¿ 

¿¿¿¿ 

Hearing Date:           3/20/2024 at 1:30 p.m.¿¿¿¿¿¿ 

Case No./Name.:      22STCV12953 LILLIAN TOSTADO vs CITY OF MONTEBELLO

Motion:                    MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE CROSS                                              COMPLAINT 

Moving Party:           Defendant City of Montebello

Responding Party:    Unopposed¿¿¿ 

Notice:                     Sufficient¿¿¿¿¿¿ 

¿¿¿¿¿¿ 

Ruling:                     MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE CROSS COMPLAINT IS GRANTED

 

Background¿ 

 

This action arises out of a trip and fall incident which occurred on April 23, 2020, in the City of Montebello. On April 18, 2022, Plaintiff filed the present case against Defendant City of Montebello. Through discovery, Defendant City was able to learn that a tree located on private property owned by Montebello Senior Villas L.P. caused/contributed to a displacement of the sidewalk where Plaintiff fell. Defendant City now moves the court for leave to file a cross complaint against Montebello Senior Villas L.P.

 

Legal Standard¿ 

¿ 

Code of Civil Procedure section 428.50 provides:¿¿ 

¿¿ 

“(a) A party shall file a cross-complaint against any of the parties who filed the complaint or cross-complaint against him or her before or at the same time as the answer to the complaint or cross-complaint.¿¿ 

¿¿ 

(b) Any other cross-complaint may be filed at any time before the court has set a date for trial.¿¿ 

¿¿ 

(c)¿A party shall obtain leave of court to file any cross-complaint except one filed¿within¿the time¿specified in subdivision (a)¿or¿(b).¿ Leave may be granted in the interest of justice at any time during the course of the action.”¿¿ 

¿¿ 

(Code Civ. Proc., § 428.50.)¿¿¿ 

¿¿ 

“A party who fails to plead a cause of action subject to the requirements of this article, whether through oversight, inadvertence, mistake, neglect, or other cause, may apply to the court for leave to amend his pleading, or to file a cross-complaint, to assert such cause at any time during the course of the action. The court, after notice to the adverse party, shall grant, upon such terms as may be just to the parties, leave to amend the pleading, or to file the cross-complaint, to assert such cause if the party who failed to plead the cause acted in good faith.¿ This subdivision shall be liberally construed to avoid forfeiture of causes of action.”¿ (Code Civ. Proc., § 426.50.) (Emphasis added.)¿¿ 

¿¿ 

The Court of Appeals has explained: “The legislative mandate is clear. A policy of liberal construction of section 426.50 to avoid forfeiture of causes of action is imposed on the trial¿court. A motion to file a cross-complaint at any time during the course of the action must be granted unless bad faith of the moving party is demonstrated where forfeiture would otherwise result. Factors such as oversight, inadvertence, neglect, mistake or other cause, are insufficient grounds to deny the motion unless accompanied by bad faith.” (Silver Organizations Ltd. v. Frank¿(1990) 217 Cal.App.3d 94, 98–99.) “‘‘Bad faith,’ is defined as ‘[t]he opposite of ‘good faith,’ generally implying or involving actual or constructive fraud, or a design to mislead or deceive another, or a neglect or refusal to fulfill some duty or some contractual obligation, not prompted by an honest mistake . . ., but by some interested or sinister motive[,] . . . not simply bad judgment or negligence, but rather . . . the conscious doing of a wrong because of dishonest purpose or moral obliquity; . . . it contemplates a state of mind affirmatively operating with furtive design or ill will. (Id. at 100.)¿¿ 

¿ 

A cross-complaint is compulsory when a related cause of action existed at the time of serving the defendant’s answer to the complaint.  (Code Civ. Proc. § 426.30, subd. (a); see also Crocker Nat. Bank v. Emerald (1990) 221 Cal.App.3d 852, 864.)  A related cause of action is “. . . a cause of action which arises out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences as the cause of action which the plaintiff alleges in his complaint.”  (Code Civ. Proc. § 426.10, subd. (c).)  Leave must be granted to file a compulsory cross-complaint when the defendant is acting in good faith.  (See Code Civ. Proc. § 426.50.)   

¿ 

Analysis and Conclusion 

 

Defendant City's cross-complaint is mandatory, as it seeks to file a claim for indemnity against MONTEBELLO SENIOR VILLAS L.P. for causes of action alleged against Defendant City in the Complaint. Moreover, Defendant City’s delay is justified as it did not learn the exact location of the incident until it conducted discovery and learned for the first time that a tree on Montebello Senior Villas L.P.'s property could have caused the displacement of the sidewalk leading to Plaintiff's trip and fall. Additionally, Plaintiff does not contend that she will be prejudiced by the filing of the cross-complaint, as there has been no opposition filed. Thus, Defendant City’s motion for leave to file a Cross-Complaint is GRANTED.  Defendant City is ordered to file its cross-complaint within 5 court days of this ruling.

 

Moving Party to give notice.  

 

¿¿¿ 

¿PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿ 

¿¿¿¿¿ 

If a party intends to submit on this tentative ruling,¿the party must send an email to the court at¿sscdept27@lacourt.org¿with the Subject line “SUBMIT” followed by the case number.¿ The body of the email must include the hearing date and time, counsel’s contact information, and the identity of the party submitting.¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿ 

¿¿¿ 

Unless¿all¿parties submit by email to this tentative ruling, the parties should arrange to appear remotely (encouraged) or in person for oral argument.¿ You should assume that others may appear at the hearing to argue.¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿ 

¿¿¿ 

If the parties neither submit nor appear at hearing, the Court may take the motion off calendar or adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the Court.¿ After the Court has issued a tentative ruling, the Court may prohibit the withdrawal of the subject motion without leave.¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿¿ 

¿¿¿ 

¿¿¿ 

¿ 

¿