Judge: Lee S. Arian, Case: 22STCV21207, Date: 2025-04-24 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV21207 Hearing Date: April 24, 2025 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF
LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
ANA LUISA MATUL LOPEZ GOMEZ, Plaintiff, vs. AURELIO SANCHEZ, et al. Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE RULING] DEMURRER IS OVERRULED Dept. 27 1:30 p.m. April 24, 2025 |
On
February 12, 2025, Plaintiff served Defendant Miriam Cohen with the First
Amended Complaint. On March 4 and March 6, 2025, Defendant emailed Plaintiff’s
counsel requesting a two-week extension to file an answer. Plaintiff responded,
“two weeks extension to file an answer is granted.” The email does not
reference a demurrer or any responsive pleading generally. It specifically
relates to an extension to file an answer. On March 25, 2025, Defendant filed the subject
demurrer.
Pursuant
to Code of Civil Procedure section 430.40, subdivision (a), “a person against
whom a complaint or cross-complaint has been filed may, within 30 days after
service of the complaint or cross-complaint, demur to the complaint or
cross-complaint.”
The demurrer was filed more than 30 days after
service of the complaint. The email exchanges between the parties relates to
filing of an answer and the extension granted by Plaintiff did not encompass
the demurrer. Had Defendant requested an extension to file a demurrer,
Plaintiff may not have agreed.
In
addition, the motion contains several other procedural errors, including an
incorrect hearing time listed in the notice of demurrer, and an improper
reference to the original complaint rather than the First Amended Complaint.
Pursuant
to these procedural errors, the Court overrules the demurrer.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org
indicating intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the
instructions provided on the court’s website at www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that if you submit on the
tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may
nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the matter. Unless you receive a submission from all
other parties in the matter, you should assume that others might appear at the
hearing to argue. If the Court does not
receive emails from the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling
and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion,
adopt the tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Lee S. Arian Judge of the Superior Court |