Judge: Lee S. Arian, Case: 22STCV24532, Date: 2025-05-20 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV24532 Hearing Date: May 20, 2025 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF
LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
ANDRANIK GRIGORYAN, Plaintiff, vs. ABRAHAM MORALES FLORES, et al. Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE RULING] MOTIONS
TO COMPEL FURTHER DEPOSITION IS GRANTED Dept. 27 1:30 p.m. May 20, 2025 |
Background
This personal injury action arises from a two-vehicle collision that
occurred on July 29, 2020, in Los Angeles, California. Plaintiff alleges he
sustained injuries and received extensive medical treatment, including
surgeries and injections, from non-parties Virella Neurosurgery and Ridge
Surgical Center. Defendant Downey Wholesale Inc. seeks discovery related to the
nature and extent of those services and charges. On March 13, 2025, Defendant
deposed Dr. Anthony Virella, the Custodian of Records and Person Most
Knowledgeable for Virella Neurosurgery and Ridge Surgical Center. At the
deposition, Dr. Virella testified that he had not reviewed the deposition
subpoenas and had not produced any of the requested documents. As a result, the
deposition was continued. Defendant re-noticed the depositions for April 11,
2025. However, Dr. Virella did not appear and failed to provide alternative
dates. Defendant now moves to compel further deposition testimony and
production of documents from the Custodian of Records of Virella Neurosurgery
and Ridge Surgical Center.
Legal Standard
Under Code of Civil Procedure section 2025.480, if a deponent fails to
answer any question or to produce any document, electronically stored
information, or tangible thing under the deponent’s control that is specified
in the deposition notice or subpoena, the party seeking discovery may move the
Court for an order compelling that answer or production. (Code Civ. Proc., §
2025.480(a).) A motion to compel must be filed no later than 60 days after the
completion of the record of the deposition. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.480(b).)
If the Court determines that the answer or production sought is subject to
discovery, it shall order that the answer be given or the production be made on
the resumption of the deposition. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.480(i).)
Additionally, the Court shall impose a monetary sanction against any
party, person, or attorney who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion to
compel, unless it finds that the person acted with substantial justification or
that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. (Code Civ.
Proc., § 2025.480(j).)
Analysis
Dr. Anthony Virella, the Custodian of Records and Person Most
Knowledgeable for Virella Neurosurgery and Ridge Surgical Center, failed to
review the deposition subpoenas and did not produce any responsive documents
prior to his March 13, 2025 deposition. The deposition was continued by
agreement to allow Dr. Virella time to review the subpoenas and produce the
requested records. Defendant acted diligently by promptly re-noticing the
deposition for April 11, 2025, and serving amended subpoenas. Despite receiving
notice and multiple meet and confer attempts by defense counsel, Dr. Virella
failed to appear and did not offer alternative deposition dates prior to the
then May 15, 2025 trial date. Plaintiff did not serve any objections to the
April 11, 2025 deposition and did not move to quash the subpoena.
The billing records, lien agreements, payments, and treatment details
sought are directly relevant to Plaintiff’s claimed damages, and Defendant is
entitled to challenge the reasonableness of those charges. Accordingly,
Defendant has satisfied the statutory requirements to compel further deposition
testimony and production of documents. Plaintiff, Virella Neurosurgery, and
Ridge Surgical Center did not file any opposition to the present motion.
Dr. Virella is ordered to appear for his continued deposition within 15
days of the date of this order. The Court finds that Virella Neurosurgery and
Ridge Surgical Center did not act with substantial justification. Dr. Virella
failed to review the subpoenas and failed to bring responsive documents to the
March 13, 2025 deposition, leading to its continuation, and then failed to
provide any alternative deposition dates prior to trial. Sanctions in the
amount of $1,000 each are imposed against Virella Neurosurgery and Ridge
Surgical Center, payable to Defendant within 20 days of the date of this order.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at
SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating intention
to submit on the tentative as directed by
the instructions provided on the court’s website at www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that if you submit on the
tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may
nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the matter. Unless you receive a submission from all
other parties in the matter, you should assume that others might appear at the
hearing to argue. If the Court does not
receive emails from the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling
and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion,
adopt the tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
|
|
|
Hon. Lee S. Arian Judge of the Superior Court |