Judge: Lee S. Arian, Case: 22STCV29925, Date: 2025-03-06 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV29925 Hearing Date: March 6, 2025 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF
LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
CELINA LEON, Plaintiff, vs. ABE BROWNSTEIN, et al., Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE RULING] MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE IS
DENIED Dept. 27 1:30 p.m. March 6, 2025 |
Defendant
moves to compel non-party, Doris Andino, to comply with its subpoena for a
deposition, but the motion is defective for the following reasons:
On
January 8, 2025, the Court granted the parties' stipulation to continue the
trial to the present trial date of April 10, 2025. The stipulation included the
provision: “IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that all non-expert discovery shall not be
continued in accordance with the new trial date.” As a result, the fact
discovery cutoff date remained tied to the prior trial date of January 27,
2025, meaning the cutoff date for non-expert discovery remained December 28,
2024.
This
motion was filed on February 10, 2025, after the deadline to file a discovery
motion. No motion to reopen discovery has been subsequently filed.
Furthermore,
under California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1346, a motion to compel a deponent’s
attendance or testimony must be personally served on the deponent. Here, the
motion was served only by mail, which does not comply with the rule.
Accordingly,
the motion is denied.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at
SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating intention
to submit on the tentative as directed by
the instructions provided on the court’s website at www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that if you submit on the
tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may
nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the matter. Unless you receive a submission from all
other parties in the matter, you should assume that others might appear at the
hearing to argue. If the Court does not
receive emails from the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling
and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion,
adopt the tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Lee S. Arian Judge of the Superior Court |