Judge: Lee S. Arian, Case: 23STCV03748, Date: 2025-04-11 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV03748 Hearing Date: April 11, 2025 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF
LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
LACHELLE WALKER JAMES, Plaintiff, vs. STEVEN ALAN LOCKSHIN, et al. Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE RULING] MOTION FOR INTERVENTION IS GRANTED Dept. 27 1:30 p.m. April 11, 2025 |
Background
On February 21, 2023, Plaintiff filed a Complaint seeking recovery for
personal injuries allegedly sustained in a vehicle accident that occurred on
March 18, 2021, at or near the intersection of Avenue R and 25th Street East in
Palmdale, Los Angeles County, California. Plaintiff named multiple defendants,
including ALLIKAT, Inc. However, according to the California Secretary of State
website, Allikat is a suspended corporation. Intervenor Infinity Select
Insurance Company now moves the Court for leave to intervene on behalf of its
insured, Defendant ALLIKAT, Inc. and ALLIKAT, Inc. dba Acme Asset Protection.
Legal Standard
CCP section 387(d) provides the
following:
(1)
The court shall, upon timely application, permit a nonparty to intervene in the
action or proceeding if either of the following conditions is satisfied:
(A) A provision of law confers an
unconditional right to intervene.
(B)
The person seeking intervention claims an interest relating to the property or
transaction that is the subject of the action and that person is so situated
that the disposition of the action may impair or impede that person’s ability
to protect that interest, unless that person’s interest is adequately
represented by one or more of the existing parties.
(2)
The court may, upon timely application, permit a nonparty to intervene in the
action or proceeding if the person has an interest in the matter in litigation,
or in the success of either of the parties, or an interest against both. (Code
Civ. Proc., § 387(d).)
Whether
the petitioner has an interest in the matter in litigation is a question of
fact that must be determined by the court before leave to file is granted. (Muller
v. Robinson (1959) 174 Cal.App.2d 511, 515; In re Yokohama Special Bank (1948)
86 Cal.App.2d 545.) The burden rests on the one seeking to intervene to show
that this is a proper case for intervention. (Muller, supra, 174
Cal.App.2d at 515.)
Pursuant to Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v. Performance
Plastering, Inc. (2006) 136 Cal.App.4th 212, 217, if an insured corporation
has been suspended (depriving it of the power to sue or defend), the insurer
must obtain leave to intervene and defend the action in its own name.
Unless it does so, the insurer cannot defend the action on the corporation's behalf
without reviving the corporation from its suspended status. (Id. at
220.)
Discussion
Infinity Select Insurance Company has shown that its insured, ALLIKAT,
Inc., is a suspended corporation. The insurance company has established a
direct and immediate interest warranting intervention, as it may be held
directly liable for any judgment entered against its insured, and without
intervention, it will have no opportunity to contest liability or damages.
Under Kaufman, insurer must obtain to intervene under such circumstances.
No opposition has been filed indicating that the interest of any existing party
outweighs the grounds for intervention. Accordingly, the motion is granted. The
moving party is ordered to serve its pleading within 20 days of the date of
this order. Moving party is to give notice.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at
SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating intention
to submit on the tentative as directed by
the instructions provided on the court’s website at www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that if you submit on the
tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may
nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the matter. Unless you receive a submission from all
other parties in the matter, you should assume that others might appear at the
hearing to argue. If the Court does not
receive emails from the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling
and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion,
adopt the tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Lee S. Arian Judge of the Superior Court |