Judge: Lee S. Arian, Case: 23STCV06270, Date: 2024-02-09 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV06270 Hearing Date: February 9, 2024 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL
DISTRICT
|
CLAUDIA YESENIA CHICAS ROMAN Plaintiff, vs. MERCADO
NUMERO UNO, INC., et al. Defendant(s), |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE]
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO COMPEL AND TO DEEM REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION ADMITTED; REQUESTS FOR SANCTIONS Dept.
27 1:30
p.m. February
9, 2024 |
I. INTRODUCTION
On
March 21, 2023, Plaintiff Claudia Yesenia Chicas Roman (“Plaintiff”) filed this
action against Defendant MERCADO NUMERO UNO, INC., et al. (“Defendant”).[1] for
premises liability and general negligence arising from a slip and fall incident
at Defendant’s store.
On
August 8, 2023, Defendant served Plaintiff with form interrogatories, special
interrogatories, requests for production of documents and requests for admission. However, Defendant received no responses from
Plaintiff.
On October 12,
2023, Defendant requested verified responses from Plaintiff to each discovery
request, without objection, by October 20, 2023. Plaintiff, however, failed to
respond.
On November 21,
2023, Defendant filed motions to compel the interrogatories and the requests
for documents and to establish admissions as to all matters specified in the
requests for admissions. Plaintiff does
not oppose any of these motions; however, on February 8, 2024, one day before
the hearing on this motion, Fred Hanassab, Plaintiff’s counsel filed a declaration
indicating that responses to the requests for admission had been served on
Defendant on November 8, 2023, prior to the filing of the discovery motions. Because
there have been no responses and no oppositions to the motions to compel, and pursuant
to the applicable discovery statutes, the Court grants Defendant’s motions to
compel. It denies the motion to deem
requests admitted.
IV. CONCLUSION
Defendant’s motions to compel are GRANTED. Plaintiff is ordered to provide responses to the
form interrogatories, special interrogatories and requests for admission served
on her on August 8, 2023, without objection, within 30 days of receiving notice
of this order. Defendant’s motion to
deem the requests for admissions admitted is DENIED.
Defendant’s requests for sanctions are
GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiff and her counsel, jointly and severally, are hereby
ordered to pay monetary sanctions to Defendant in the total amount of $1800.00
within 30 days of receiving notice of this order.
Moving party to give notice.
Parties who intend to submit on this
tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating
intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided
on the court website at www.lacourt.org.
Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to
appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the
hearing and argue the matter. Unless you
receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume
that others might appear at the hearing to argue. If the Court does not receive emails from the
parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no
appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the
tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
Dated
this 9th Day of February, 2024
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Lee S. Arian Judge of the Superior Court |
[1] Defendant’s name was erroneously
sued and served. The instant motions were filed under its claimed correct name
“NUMERO UNO ACQUISITIONS, LLC”