Judge: Lee S. Arian, Case: 23STCV07814, Date: 2025-05-02 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 23STCV07814    Hearing Date: May 2, 2025    Dept: 27

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT

Background

Attorney Hesam Yazdanpanah represents Plaintiff. Yazdanpanah moves to be relieved as counsel, citing an irremediable breakdown in the attorney-client relationship. No opposition has been filed.

Legal Standard

The Court has discretion to allow an attorney to withdraw, and such a motion should be granted provided that there is no prejudice to the client and it does not disrupt the orderly process of justice. (See Ramirez v. Sturdevant (1994) 21 Cal.App.4th 904, 915; People v. Prince (1968) 268 Cal.App.2d 398, 403-407.)

A motion to be relieved as counsel must be made on Judicial Council Form MC-051 (Notice of Motion and Motion), MC-052 (Declaration), and MC-053 (Proposed Order). (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362, subds. (a), (c), (e).) The requisite forms must be served “on the client and on all parties that have appeared in the case.” (Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362, subd. (d).)

Analysis and Conclusion

Yazdanpanah has filed Judicial Council Form MC-051 (Notice of Motion and Motion), MC-052 (Declaration), and MC-053 (Proposed Order). Yazdanpanah seeks to be relieved as counsel for Plaintiff on the grounds that there has been a breakdown in the attorney-client relationship and communication. The Court finds this to be proper grounds for withdrawal. (See Estate of Falco (1987) 188 Cal.App.3d 1004, 1014 (a breakdown in the attorney-client relationship or communication is grounds for allowing the attorney to withdraw).)

The Court notes that although Plaintiff’s address was not confirmed by counsel through direct contact within the past 30 days, counsel has exercised reasonable diligence in attempting to locate Plaintiff by mailing the motion to Plaintiff’s last known address, calling the last known number, and conducting a skip trace using Plaintiff’s address, driver’s license, and date of birth. Furthermore, counsel served the moving papers on the Clerk of the Court at the Stanley Mosk Courthouse pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1011 and California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362(d).

The next hearing is an FSC set for 12/30/25, which should be sufficient time for Plaintiff to retain new counsel. Alternatively, if Plaintiff or new counsel needs additional time to prepare for trial, sufficient time exists for Plaintiff to take action to seek a continuance of the trial. Thus, the present motion to be relieved as counsel is GRANTED effective upon service on Plaintiff.  (The Court notes that service must be effected as directed by Code of Civil Procedure section 1011 and California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362(d).)

Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided on the court’s website at www.lacourt.org.  Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the matter.  Unless you receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume that others might appear at the hearing to argue.  If the Court does not receive emails from the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion, adopt the tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.