Judge: Lee S. Arian, Case: 23STCV18586, Date: 2025-02-21 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV18586 Hearing Date: February 21, 2025 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF
LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
CLINTON NIXON, Plaintiff, vs. CATHY SCOTT, et al., Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE RULING] MOTION TO BE RELIEVED
AS COUNSEL IS GRANTED Dept. 27 1:30 p.m. February 21, 2025 |
Background
Attorney Sharona Hakim represents Plaintiff. Hakim moves to be
relieved as counsel, citing an irremediable breakdown in the attorney-client
relationship. No opposition has been filed.
Legal
Standard¿
The Court has discretion to allow an attorney to withdraw, and
such a motion should be granted provided that there is no prejudice to the
client and it does not disrupt the orderly process of justice. (See Ramirez
v. Sturdevant (1994) 21 Cal.App.4th 904, 915; People v. Prince (1968)
268 Cal.App.2d 398, 403-407.)
A motion to be relieved as counsel must be made on Judicial
Council Form MC-051 (Notice of Motion and Motion), MC-052 (Declaration), and
MC-053 (Proposed Order). (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362, subds. (a), (c),
(e).) The requisite forms must be served “on the client and on all parties that
have appeared in the case.” (Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362, subd.
(d).)
Analysis
and Conclusion¿
Hakim has filed Judicial Council Form MC-051 (Notice of Motion
and Motion), MC-052 (Declaration), and MC-053 (Proposed Order). Hakim seeks to
be relieved as counsel for Plaintiff on the grounds that there has been a
breakdown in the attorney-client relationship. The Court finds this to be
proper grounds for withdrawal. (See Estate of Falco (1987) 188
Cal.App.3d 1004, 1014 (a breakdown in the attorney-client relationship is
grounds for allowing the attorney to withdraw).)
The Court notes that, within the past 30 days, Plaintiff's
address was confirmed to be current by counsel through a phone call. There is
currently no trial date set and the next hearing is an Order to Show Cause Re:
Dismissal for Failure to File Proof of Service set for 5/8/25, which should be
sufficient time for Plaintiff to retain new counsel. Thus, the present motion
to be relieved as counsel is GRANTED effective upon service on Plaintiff.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at
SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating intention
to submit on the tentative as directed by
the instructions provided on the court’s website at www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that if you submit on the
tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may
nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the matter. Unless you receive a submission from all
other parties in the matter, you should assume that others might appear at the
hearing to argue. If the Court does not
receive emails from the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling
and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion,
adopt the tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Lee S. Arian Judge of the Superior Court |