Judge: Lee S. Arian, Case: 23STCV22029, Date: 2025-04-18 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV22029 Hearing Date: April 18, 2025 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF
LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
HUGO MINOTT, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. ROBERTO MORELOS, et al. Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE RULING] MOTION TO CONTINUE IS GRANTED Dept. 27 1:30 p.m. April 18, 2025 |
Defendant City of Los Angeles moves to continue the current trial date
of July 10, 2025, to a date no earlier than September 17, 2025, so that its
motion for summary judgment scheduled for August 18, 2025 may be heard in
compliance with Code of Civil Procedure section 437c(a)(3), which requires the
motion to be heard at least 30 days before trial.
On March 19, 2025, Defendant
filed its motion for summary judgment. The hearing is currently scheduled for
August 18, 2025, which is after the current trial date of July 10, 2025.
Plaintiff does not dispute the filing date or that the motion was timely.
Plaintiff only requests that the continued trial date not extend beyond
September 17, 2025. Numerous courts of appeal have held that a trial court
cannot refuse to consider a timely filed motion for summary judgment. “A trial
court may not refuse to hear a summary judgment filed within the time limits of
[Code of Civil Procedure] section 437c. [Citation.] Local rules and practices
may not be applied so as to prevent the filing and hearing of such a motion.”
(Sentry Ins. Co. v. Superior Court (1989) 207 Cal.App.3d 526, 529.)
Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment is timely filed, and the
request to continue trial is granted so that the motion may be heard prior to
trial.
The new Trial Date is set for September 17, 2025, at 8:30 a.m. The Final
Status Conference is continued to September 3, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. The only
basis to continue the trial date is so the motion for summary judgment can be
heard. Defendant has not shown good cause to have the fact discovery cut-off
follow the new trial date. Should the parties wish to reopen fact discovery,
they can do so either through stipulation or motion. All other
case-related deadlines, including expert discovery, will follow the new trial
date.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at
SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating intention
to submit on the tentative as directed by
the instructions provided on the court’s website at www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that if you submit on the
tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may
nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the matter. Unless you receive a submission from all
other parties in the matter, you should assume that others might appear at the
hearing to argue. If the Court does not
receive emails from the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling
and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion,
adopt the tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Lee S. Arian Judge of the Superior Court |