Judge: Lee S. Arian, Case: 23STCV23114, Date: 2025-05-23 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV23114 Hearing Date: May 23, 2025 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF
LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
MARNESHA HUNTER, Plaintiffs, vs. KAISER PERMANENTE LLC, et al. Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE RULING] MOTION TO DEEM RFA ADMITTED Dept. 27 1:30 p.m. May 23, 2025 |
On February 9, 2025, Plaintiff served Requests for Admission, Set One,
on Defendant Elaine De Leon Guerrero, who is appearing in pro per. At the deposition
on March 5, 2025, Plaintiff’s counsel reminded Defendant that she needed to
respond to the outstanding discovery, including the RFAs. Defendant
acknowledged this obligation and indicated she would respond. To date,
Defendant has not served any responses to Plaintiff’s Requests for Admission.
Plaintiff now moves the Court to deem the matters set forth in his Requests for
Admission, Set One, as admitted.
If a party to whom request for admissions are served fails to provide a
timely response, the party to whom the request was directed waives any
objections, including based on privilege or the work product doctrine. CCP §
2033.280(a). The requesting party can move for an order that the genuineness of
any documents and the truth of any matters specified in the request be deemed
admitted, as well as for monetary sanctions. CCP § 2033.280(b). The court shall
issue this order unless the party to whom the request was made serves a
response in substantial compliance prior to the hearing on the motion
Defendant did not file an opposition or submit any other filing
indicating that responses were served prior to the hearing. Accordingly, the
motion is granted, and the matters set forth in Plaintiff’s Requests for
Admission, Set One, are deemed admitted. Plaintiff did not request sanctions.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at
SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating intention
to submit on the tentative as directed by
the instructions provided on the court’s website at www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that if you submit on the
tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may
nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the matter. Unless you receive a submission from all
other parties in the matter, you should assume that others might appear at the
hearing to argue. If the Court does not
receive emails from the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling
and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion,
adopt the tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Lee S. Arian Judge of the Superior Court |