Judge: Lee S. Arian, Case: 23STCV25570, Date: 2025-03-19 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV25570 Hearing Date: March 19, 2025 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF
LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
BRITTANY CHAPMAN, Plaintiff, vs. GUILLERMO AGUILAR, et al., Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE RULING] MOTION TO CONTINUE IS GRANTED IN
PART Dept. 27 1:30 p.m. March 19, 2025 |
On October 19, 2023, Plaintiff filed this case. Trial is currently set
for April 17, 2025.
Defendant seeks a continuance to December 2025, citing a scheduling
conflict as lead defense counsel is set to begin an estimated 5-day trial in Martinez
v. Molina (23STLC06627) in Department 26 on April 14, 2025.
The Court finds no justification for an eight-month continuance to
accommodate counsel’s scheduling conflict. However, given the lack of
opposition and the reasons stated for the request, the Court grants an
approximate 30-day continuance.
The new trial date is set for May 27, 2025, at 8:30 a.m. The Final Status Conference is
continued to May 13, 2025,
at 10:00 a.m. With the exception of expert discovery, all other
case-related deadlines remain unchanged and will not follow the new trial date,
as the only basis for the continuance is to accommodate counsel’s trial
schedule. Defendant has provided no justification to reopen fact discovery.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at
SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating intention
to submit on the tentative as directed by
the instructions provided on the court’s website at www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that if you submit on the
tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may
nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the matter. Unless you receive a submission from all
other parties in the matter, you should assume that others might appear at the
hearing to argue. If the Court does not
receive emails from the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling
and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion,
adopt the tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Lee S. Arian Judge of the Superior Court |