Judge: Lee S. Arian, Case: 23STCV26216, Date: 2025-02-04 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV26216 Hearing Date: February 4, 2025 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF
LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
RUTH POWELL Plaintiff, vs. LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY, et al Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE RULING] MOTION FOR TRIAL
PREFERENCE IS CONTINUED Dept. 27 1:30 p.m. February 4, 2025 |
On
October 26, 2023, Plaintiff filed the present case, alleging injuries resulting
from a bus operator’s failure to provide necessary assistance while Plaintiff
was boarding and seating. The case is currently set for trial on April 24,
2025. Plaintiff now moves for trial preference.
Plaintiff
asserts in the moving papers that she is 84 years old but provides no
declaration, birth certificate, or other supporting documentation to
substantiate this claim.
Plaintiff’s
attorney states that Plaintiff suffers from hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and
osteoporosis and submits a discharge summary to that effect. However, these are
chronic medical conditions that, on their face, do not appear to impair
Plaintiff’s ability to participate in litigation. Code of Civil Procedure
section 36(d) requires a showing that the party’s health is such that a trial
delay would prejudice her ability to participate in the litigation. Plaintiff
has failed to meet this standard.
However,
given Plaintiff’s apparent age and health, the Court deems it appropriate to
give her time to supplement the record in support of this motion. Accordingly, the Court continues the hearing
to 2/25/25, at 1:30 p.m. Plaintiff is to
file any supplemental information by 2/11/25; Defendant may file any responsive
document by 2/18/25.
Moving
party to give Notice.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at
SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating intention
to submit on the tentative as directed by
the instructions provided on the court’s website at www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that if you submit on the
tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may
nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the matter. Unless you receive a submission from all
other parties in the matter, you should assume that others might appear at the
hearing to argue. If the Court does not
receive emails from the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling
and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion,
adopt the tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Lee S. Arian Judge of the Superior Court |