Judge: Lee S. Arian, Case: 23STCV29703, Date: 2025-04-28 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23STCV29703 Hearing Date: April 28, 2025 Dept: 27
SUPERIOR COURT OF
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF
LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT
|
ERIK BROWN, Plaintiff, vs. LUCIANO R. VELASQUEZ, et al. Defendants. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
[TENTATIVE RULING] MOTION TO CONTINUE IS GRANTED Dept. 27 1:30 p.m. April 28, 2025 |
Background
On December
5, 2023, Plaintiff filed the present action. Trial is currently set for June 3,
2025. Defendant moves the court to continue the trial date to December 2, 2025.
The basis for the continuance is that essential discovery remains outstanding,
including the completion of Plaintiff’s deposition and an independent medical
examination. In addition, defense counsel recently substituted into the case
and has another trial set for the same date as the current trial date. This is also
the parties’ first request for a trial continuance, and all parties stipulate
and agree to the continuance.
The Court
finds good cause for the continuance. Defendant has demonstrated that despite
diligent efforts, critical discovery necessary for trial preparation remains
incomplete. The recent substitution of defense counsel and the conflict created
by existing trial commitments further support the need for additional time. The
Court also notes that no party will suffer prejudice from the continuance and
that all parties have stipulated to the requested extension.
Accordingly,
the Court grants the motion. The new Trial Date is set for December __, 2025,
at 8:30 a.m. The Final Status Conference is continued to November__, 2025, at
10:00 a.m.
All
case-related deadlines will follow the new trial date.
Parties
who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the Court at
SSCDEPT27@lacourt.org indicating intention
to submit on the tentative as directed by
the instructions provided on the court’s website at www.lacourt.org. Please be advised that if you submit on the
tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may
nevertheless appear at the hearing and argue the matter. Unless you receive a submission from all
other parties in the matter, you should assume that others might appear at the
hearing to argue. If the Court does not
receive emails from the parties indicating submission on this tentative ruling
and there are no appearances at the hearing, the Court may, at its discretion,
adopt the tentative as the final order or place the motion off calendar.
|
|
|
|
|
Hon. Lee S. Arian Judge of the Superior Court |