Judge: Lee W. Tsao, Case: 21NWCV00062, Date: 2023-09-13 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21NWCV00062 Hearing Date: January 3, 2024 Dept: C
global med group v.
kaiser
CASE NO.: 21NWCV00062
HEARING: 1/3/24 @ 9:30 AM
#1
Defendant’s request for issue, evidence, and
terminating sanctions is DENIED. Defendant’s request for monetary sanctions is
GRANTED in part.
Moving Party to give NOTICE.
Defendant Kaiser Permanente (Defendant) seeks
issue, evidence, terminating, and monetary sanctions against Plaintiff Global
Med Group, LLC (Plaintiff) for its failure to comply with this Court’s previous
order.
Plaintiff
filed a Complaint against Defendant for an alleged breach of contract arising
out of an order of 20,188,000 protective face masks in 2020.
Legal
Standard
If
a party fails to comply with a court order compelling discovery responses or
attendance at a deposition, the court may impose monetary, issue, evidence, or
terminating sanctions. (CCP § 2025.450(h); § 2030.290(c); § 2031.300(c).) “To
the extent authorized by the chapter governing any particular discovery method … the court, after notice to any affected party,
person, or attorney, and after opportunity for hearing, may impose … [monetary,
issue, evidence, or terminating] sanctions against anyone engaging in conduct
that is a misuse of the discovery process ….” (CCP § 2030.030.) “Misuses of the discovery
process include, but are not limited to, the following: … (d) Failing to
respond or to submit to an authorized method of discovery … (g) Disobeying a
court order to provide discovery ….” (CCP § 2030.010.)
“The
trial court may order a terminating sanction for discovery abuse ‘after
considering the totality of the circumstances: [the] conduct of the
party to determine if the actions were willful; the detriment to the
propounding party; and the number of formal and informal attempts to obtain the
discovery.’ ” (Los Defensores, Inc. v. Gomez (2014) 223 Cal.App.4th 377,
390, quoting Lang v. Hochman (2000) 77 Cal.App.4th 1225,
1246.) “Generally, ‘[a] decision to order terminating sanctions should not
be made lightly. But where a violation is willful, preceded by a history of
abuse, and the evidence shows that less severe sanctions would not produce
compliance with the discovery rules, the trial court is justified in imposing
the ultimate sanction.’ ” (Los Defensores, supra, 223 Cal.App.4th
at 390.)
Discussion
Defendant requests monetary, issue, evidence, and
terminating sanctions for Plaintiff willfully disobeying this court’s September
13, 2023 order requiring Plaintiff to produce documents it agreed to produce in
response to Defendant’s Requests for Production (set one). Responses to those
requests included documents related to damages which are the core of this contract
dispute.
Issue, evidence, and terminating sanctions are
not warranted because Plaintiff has complied with its discovery obligations.
While Plaintiff was late in complying with its discovery obligation, Plaintiff
has produced the responsive documents previously sought. (Opposition p. 9.) Therefore,
issue, evidence, and terminating sanctions are not appropriate.
However, monetary sanctions are appropriate for
the misuse of the discovery process by disobeying a court order. Plaintiff
stated in its opposition to the underlying Motion to Compel that it was waiting
on documents from its Chinese supplier. Upon this representation, the Court
declined to award monetary sanctions at the hearing on the underlying Motion to
Compel. However, Plaintiff produced documents that were within its possession since
2020. (Ho Decl. in Reply, Ex. F.) Sanctions are awarded in the amount of
$3060.00, which reflects the time and expense expended by Defendant in bringing
the instant motion.
Accordingly, Defendant’s
request for issue, evidence, and terminating sanctions is DENIED. Monetary sanctions are imposed against
Plaintiff Global Med Group, LLC and its counsel of record, jointly and
severally, in the amount of $3060.00, payable within 30 days of this Order.