Judge: Lee W. Tsao, Case: 22NWCV00706, Date: 2023-05-17 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 22NWCV00706    Hearing Date: May 17, 2023    Dept: C

john doe v. los angeles unified school district, et al.

CASE NO.: 22NWCV00706

HEARING:  5/17/23 @ 1:30 PM

#9

TENTATIVE RULING

James Lewis and Andrew Chung’s motion to be relieved as counsel is GRANTED.

Moving Party to give NOTICE.

Plaintiff’s counsel, James Lewis and Andrew Chung moves to be relieved as counsel for John Doe.

Good cause exists to grant the motion based on any of the grounds under Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 3-700(C). Rule 3-700(c) provides that an attorney may withdraw based on any of the following: (1) The client (a) insists upon presenting a claim or defense that is not warranted under existing law and cannot be supported by good faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of existing law, or (b) seeks to pursue an illegal course of conduct, or (c) insists that the member pursue a course of conduct that is illegal or that is prohibited under these rules or the State Bar Act, or (d) by other conduct renders it unreasonably difficult for the member to carry out the employment effectively, or (e) insists, in a matter not pending before a tribunal, that the member engage in conduct that is contrary to the judgment and advice of the member but not prohibited under these rules or the State Bar Act, or (f) breaches an agreement or obligation to the member as to expenses or fees. (2) The continued employment is likely to result in a violation of these rules or of the State Bar Act; or (3) the inability to work with co-counsel indicates that the best interests of the client likely will be served by withdrawal; or (4) The member's mental or physical condition renders it difficult for the member to carry out the employment effectively; or (5) The client knowingly and freely assents to termination of the employment; or (6) The member believes in good faith, in a proceeding pending before a tribunal, that the tribunal will find the existence of other good cause for withdrawal. 

The attorney declaration demonstrates good cause for withdrawal based on the breakdown of the attorney-client relationship and counsel averring that it has become unreasonably difficult to effectively represent the client. The client was served by mail at their last known address. Counsel was unable to confirm that address despite calling the client’s last known telephone number.

The motion is GRANTED.  The order shall take effect when the proof of service of the signed order on the client has been filed with the court.