Judge: Lee W. Tsao, Case: 22NWCV01495, Date: 2023-10-19 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22NWCV01495 Hearing Date: October 19, 2023 Dept: C
EDWARDS v.
HARDGRAVE
CASE NO.: 22NWCV01495
HEARING: 10/19/23
#6
Plaintiff’s Demurrer to Defendant BILL DEAN HARDGRAVE’s
Answer is SUSTAINED with 30 days leave to amend.
Moving Party to give notice.
This personal injury
(motor vehicle) action was filed by Plaintiffs DEBORAH EDWARDS and BENJAMIN
WINSTON EDWARDS (“Plaintiffs”) against Defendant BILL DEAN HARDGRAVE
(“Defendant”) on December 5, 2022.
Plaintiffs allege
that “prior to the collision, Defendant… knew that he had to operate his
vehicle… but he knowingly and intentionally consumer quantities of alcohol
prior to operating his vehicle…. Defendant… entered his automobile and operated
his vehicle on the public streets and highways in a severely impaired
condition, at a speed significantly over the speed limit, and without any
attention to the vehicles and traffic lights on the road.” (Complaint ¶9.)
On May 1, 2023,
2023, Defendant filed the subject Answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint. In the
Answer, Defendant asserts a general denial, and twenty affirmative defenses.
Plaintiff specially
and generally demurs to Defendant’s first through twentieth affirmative
defenses.
CCP §430.20(a) states that a demurrer to an Answer is
properly sustained where, “[t]he answer does not state facts sufficient to
constitute a defense.” Here, Defendant’s Answer consists of legal conclusions,
devoid of factual support. No facts are alleged to support any Defendant’s
second through seventeenth affirmative defenses. Rather, “the allegations are
proffered in the form of terse legal conclusions, rather than as facts ‘averred
as carefully and with as much detail as the facts which constitute the cause of
action and are alleged in the complaint. [Cite.]” (FPI Development, Inc. v.
Nakashima (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 367, 384.)
Defendant filed a boilerplate Answer, devoid of any factual support. The
Demurrer is SUSTAINED with 30 days leave to amend for failure to state facts
sufficient to constitute an affirmative defense.