Judge: Lee W. Tsao, Case: 22STCV39173, Date: 2023-10-18 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 22STCV39173 Hearing Date: October 18, 2023 Dept: C
Nava v. Nature’s Produce
CASE NO.: 22STCV39173
HEARING: 10/18/23 @ 10:30 AM
#6
I.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Demand for Site Inspection is GRANTED.
II.
Plaintiff’s request for sanctions against Flying Food is DENIED.
III.
Plaintiff’s request for sanctions against Defendant Nature’s Produce is
GRANTED.
Moving Party to give NOTICE.
Plaintiff John Danial Richard Nava (Plaintiff) moves
for an order compelling compliance with his Demand for Site Inspection.
Plaintiff
filed a Complaint against Defendants Flying Food Group, Inc. (Flying Food) and
Nature’s Produce alleging Negligence and Premise Liability from a slip and fall
incident. There is a dispute as to which Defendant controlled the site of the
incident. Plaintiff seeks a site inspection to determine control and the exact
location of the incident.
Legal
Standard
“A
party may demand that any other party allow the party making the demand, or
someone acting on the demanding party’s behalf, to enter on any land or other
property that is in the possession, custody, or control of the party on whom
the demand is made, and to inspect and to measure, survey, photograph, test, or
sample the land or other property, or any designated object or operation on it.”
(Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.010, subd. (d).)¿
Meet
and Confer
Plaintiff
adequately met and conferred with Defendant.
Discussion
Plaintiff seeks to compel an inspection of the
site of the incident giving rise to this action, commonly known as 3305 Bandini
Boulevard, Vernon, California. Plaintiff served his Demand for Site Inspection
(Demand) on June 26, 2023 and noticed the inspection for August 3, 2023. Both
Defendants objected to the Demand. On August 1, 2023, Defendant Flying Food
withdrew its objections and Defendant Nature’s Produce amended its objections.
Defendant Nature’s Produce stated it would not allow the site inspection to
proceed until after Plaintiff’s deposition.
Defendant Nature’s Produce is ordered to comply
with Plaintiff’s Demand for Site Inspection within 20 days of this Order.
Nature’s Produce’s insistence that it would not comply until Plaintiff’s
deposition was taken is not supported by law.
Defendant Flying Food has already withdrawn its
objections to the site inspection.
Sanctions
The court shall impose a monetary sanction
against the party who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion to compel
further responses to interrogatories or demand for production of documents
unless the party subject to the sanction acted with substantial justification
or the sanction would otherwise be unjust. (CCP §§ 2030.300(d), 2031.310(h),
2033.290(d).) Sanctions may be awarded, even though no opposition is filed
pursuant to CRC 3.1348(a).
Plaintiff seeks $3,000.00 in sanctions against
Defendants and their counsel of record, consisting of “at least five hours in
the process of meeting and conferring” and drafting the motion and three hours
to review an opposition, draft a reply, and attend the hearing at a rate of
$400.00 per hour and the $60.00 filing fee. Plaintiff’s counsel reduced the
request of sanctions from $3,260.00 to $3,000.00. Plaintiff’s request for
sanctions against Defendant Flying Food’s and its counsel is denied because Flying
Food’s withdrew its objections. Plaintiff’s request for sanctions against
Defendant Nature’s Produce and its counsel is granted in the reduced amount of
$1,460.00.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s
Motion to Compel his Demand for Site Inspection is GRANTED. Defendants are
ordered to comply with Plaintiff’s Demand for Site Inspection within 20 days of
this Order. Plaintiff’s request for sanctions against Flying Food is DENIED.
Plaintiff’s request for sanctions against Defendant Nature’s Produce is GRANTED
and imposed against Defendant Nature’s Produce and its counsel of record,
jointly and severally, in the reduced amount of $1,460.00. This sanction is to
be paid within 45 days of this Order.