Judge: Lee W. Tsao, Case: 23NWCV00215, Date: 2023-08-23 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 23NWCV00215    Hearing Date: August 23, 2023    Dept: C

S-h, llc v. grigoryan

CASE NO.:  23NWCV00215

HEARING 8/23/23 @ 9:30 AM

#2

 

Plaintiff S-H, LLC’s Motions to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories, Requests for Production, and Requests for Admission are DENIED.

Moving Party to give NOTICE.

 

Plaintiff S-H, LLC (Plaintiff) moves for an order compelling responses to its Form Interrogatories, Requests for Production, and Requests for Admission pursuant to CCP § 2030.260, 2031.300, and 2033.280. These motions are unopposed.

Background

This is a commercial unlawful detainer action related to a Bell Gardens property. Plaintiff alleges on January 12, 2023 it demanded Defendant Sergey Grigoryan (Defendant) repay the $46,761.08 outstanding on the lease. Defendant did not repay the outstanding amount and Plaintiff seeks $388.68 per day beginning February 1, 2023.

Legal Standard

“The party propounding interrogatories shall serve a copy of them on the party to whom the interrogatories are directed.” (CCP § 2030.080.)

“The party making a demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling shall serve a copy of the demand on the party to whom it is directed and on all other parties who have appeared in the action.” (CCP § 2031.040.)

“The party requesting admissions shall serve a copy of them on the party to whom they are directed and on all other parties who have appeared in the action.” (CCP § 2033.070.)

Discussion

This Court has previously ruled that Plaintiff’s notice as to service of the Complaint and the June 15, 2023 Ex Parte Application were improper for serving the documents on the incorrect address and by methods not authorized by Defendant’s counsel. Plaintiff has routinely served documents related to this lawsuit at the 3780 Kilrov Airport Way, Suite 200, Long Beach, California 90806 address despite being informed that Defendant’s counsel does not accept service at this address. Defendant’s counsel’s pleadings in this matter indicate that the proper address is 10262 Foothill Boulevard, Like View Terrace, California 91342. The written discovery requests subject to the motions were all served on the Airport Way address. Thus, service was improper, and Plaintiff’s motions must be denied.

 

Accordingly, Plaintiff S-H, LLC’s Motions to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories, Requests for Production, and Requests for Admission are DENIED.

Pursuant to CCP § 1010.6(a)(2)(A)(ii), Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to use either of the following methods of service upon Defendant’s counsel, unless otherwise required by law:

By mail (including express and overnight delivery) :

10262 Foothill Boulevard

Lake View Terrace, CA  91342

 

Electronically:

mdattaray@dattaray.law.com