Judge Lee W. Tsao, Case Number: 23NWCV00796, Date: 2023-06-29 Tentative Ruling

Judge: Lee W. Tsao, Case: 23NWCV00796, Date: 2023-06-29 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 23NWCV00796 Hearing Date: March 26, 2024 Dept: C

Valerie Naranjo vs GMJ Garcia Inc, et al.

Case No.: 23NWCV00796

Hearing Date: March 26, 2024 @ 10:30 AM

Tentative Ruling

Plaintiff’s Counsel Sam Nordean’s Motion to be Relieved as Counsel for Plaintiff Valerie Naranjo is GRANTED.

Plaintiff’s Counsel to give notice.

This is a negligence and premises liability action.

Plaintiff Counsel’s Sam Nordean, Esq. moves to be relieved as counsel for Plaintiff Valerie Naranjo.

As of March 18, 2024, this motion is unopposed.

Good cause exists to grant the motion based on any of the grounds under Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 3-700(C). Rule 3-700(c) provides that an attorney may withdraw based on any of the following: (1) The client (a) insists upon presenting a claim or defense that is not warranted under existing law and cannot be supported by good faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of existing law, or (b) seeks to pursue an illegal course of conduct, or (c) insists that the member pursue a course of conduct that is illegal or that is prohibited under these rules or the State Bar Act, or (d) by other conduct renders it unreasonably difficult for the member to carry out the employment effectively, or (e) insists, in a matter not pending before a tribunal, that the member engage in conduct that is contrary to the judgment and advice of the member but not prohibited under these rules or the State Bar Act, or (f) breaches an agreement or obligation to the member as to expenses or fees. (2) The continued employment is likely to result in a violation of these rules or of the State Bar Act; or (3) the inability to work with co-counsel indicates that the best interests of the client likely will be served by withdrawal; or (4) The member's mental or physical condition renders it difficult for the member to carry out the employment effectively; or (5) The client knowingly and freely assents to termination of the employment; or (6) The member believes in good faith, in a proceeding pending before a tribunal, that the tribunal will find the existence of other good cause for withdrawal.

The attorney declaration demonstrates good cause for withdrawal based on a breakdown in the attorney-client relationship. The client was served by mail at her last known addresses, which was confirmed to be current within the past 30 days and by telephone.

Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED.