Judge: Lee W. Tsao, Case: 23NWCV01378, Date: 2023-11-29 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 23NWCV01378    Hearing Date: November 29, 2023    Dept: C

ramirez v. barraza REFRIGERATED transportation, et al.

CASE NO.:  23NWCV01378

HEARING:  11/29/23 @ 10:30 AM

#7

Plaintiff’s counsel’s Motion to be Relieved as Counsel is DENIED.

The Wilshire Law Firm is to give NOTICE.

Defendants’ counsel, William White of Wilshire Law Firm moves to be relieved as counsel for Plaintiff Alfred Steve Ramirez (Plaintiff).

Background

This is a motor vehicle negligence action filed by Plaintiff against Defendants Barraza Refrigerated Transportation, Inc., Martin Leonardo Garibay-Torres, Hector Barraza, and Andrew Hernandez.

Discussion

There has not been a showing of good cause through the attached declaration. However, counsel may present such evidence at the hearing. Good cause exists to grant the motion based on any of the grounds under Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 3-700(C). Rule 3-700(c) provides that an attorney may withdraw based on any of the following: (1) The client (a) insists upon presenting a claim or defense that is not warranted under existing law and cannot be supported by good faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of existing law, or (b) seeks to pursue an illegal course of conduct, or (c) insists that the member pursue a course of conduct that is illegal or that is prohibited under these rules or the State Bar Act, or (d) by other conduct renders it unreasonably difficult for the member to carry out the employment effectively, or (e) insists, in a matter not pending before a tribunal, that the member engage in conduct that is contrary to the judgment and advice of the member but not prohibited under these rules or the State Bar Act, or (f) breaches an agreement or obligation to the member as to expenses or fees. (2) The continued employment is likely to result in a violation of these rules or of the State Bar Act; or (3) the inability to work with co-counsel indicates that the best interests of the client likely will be served by withdrawal; or (4) The member's mental or physical condition renders it difficult for the member to carry out the employment effectively; or (5) The client knowingly and freely assents to termination of the employment; or (6) The member believes in good faith, in a proceeding pending before a tribunal, that the tribunal will find the existence of other good cause for withdrawal.

Plaintiff was served by mail at its last known address which was confirmed in the last 30 days.

The motion is DENIED.