Judge: Lee W. Tsao, Case: 23NWCV01649, Date: 2023-09-20 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 23NWCV01649    Hearing Date: September 20, 2023    Dept: C

Suarez v. Macy’s v.

CASE NO.:  23NWCV01649

HEARING 9/20/23 @ 10:30 AM

#9

 

Defendant’s demurrer to Plaintiff’s Second through Fifth Causes of Action is OVERRULED.

Moving Party to give NOTICE.

 

Defendant Macy’s Inc. (Defendant) demurs to Plaintiff’s Second through Fifth Causes of Action pursuant to CCP § 430.10(e).

Background

Plaintiff Blanca Suarez (Plaintiff) filed this Complaint for injuries sustained after the packaging containing a Vortex Air Fryer broke causing the box to fall on Plaintiff while she was carrying it. Plaintiff alleges she was carrying the air fryer to her car after she purchased it from Defendant.  Plaintiff brings causes of action for:

     I.        General Negligence

    II.        Products Liability – Manufacturing Defect

  III.        Products Liability – Design Defect

 IV.        Negligence – Failure to Warn

   V.        Negligence – Recall/Retrofit

 

Legal Standard

The party against whom a complaint has been filed may object to the pleading, by demurrer, on several grounds, including the ground that the pleading does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. (CCP § 430.10(e).) A party may demur to an entire complaint, or to any causes of action stated therein. (CCP § 430.50(a).)

Discussion

Defendant argues that Plaintiff’s Second through Fifth Causes of Action for failure to state a claim because Plaintiff’s Complaint does not include allegations that Defendant manufactured or designed the product. “Beyond manufacturers, anyone identifiable as ‘an integral part of the overall producing and marketing enterprise’ is subject to strict liability. [Citation.] Accordingly, retailers engaged in the business of distributing goods to the public are strictly liable in tort for personal injuries caused by defects in those goods.” (Arriaga v. CitiCapital Commercial Corp. (2008) 167 Cal.App.4th 1527, 1534.) Thus, Plaintiff’s allegations that Defendant sold Plaintiff the product are sufficient to support a product liability cause of action. (Compl. ¶ 11.) Therefore, Defendant’s demurrer to Plaintiff’s Second through Fifth Causes of Action is overruled.

 

Accordingly, Defendant’s demurrer to Plaintiff’s Second through Fifth Causes of Action is OVERRULED.