Judge: Lee W. Tsao, Case: 23NWCV02129, Date: 2024-08-28 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 23NWCV02129 Hearing Date: August 28, 2024 Dept: C
JOHNSON v. FOREST RIVER, INC.
CASE
NO.: 23NWCV02129
HEARING:
8/28/24 @ 9:30 A.M.
#3
TENTATIVE RULING
Plaintiff Norma Ramos Johnson’s motion to compel further responses to Request
for Production of Documents, Set One is CONTINUED to November 20, 2024 at 10:30
a.m. in Dept. SE-C.
Moving Party to give NOTICE.
This is a Song-Beverly action about a 2022 Forest
River Wildwood Towables vehicle. Plaintiff moves to compel further responses to Requests
for Production of Documents, Set One, request numbers 16 through 21.
Timeliness
Notice of the motion to compel further must be
provided within 45 days of service of the verified response or on or before any
specific later date to which the parties have agreed. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.310,
subd. (c).) This 45-day deadline runs from the date the verified response is
served and is extended for service by mail in accordance with Code of Civil
Procedure sections 1010.6, subdivision (a)(4) and 1013, subdivision (a). Failure
to timely move to compel within the specified period constitutes a waiver of
any right to compel a further response. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.310, subd. (c).)
On November 9, 2023, Defendant
served verified responses to Plaintiff’s first set of requests for production
of documents. (Decl. Bedwan, ¶ 14, Ex. 3, 4.)
Adding the days for electronic
service, the clock ran on December 28, 2024. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1010.6, subd.
(a)(3), 2016.050.) Plaintiff filed on December 26, 2023.
Thus, Plaintiff is timely.
Meet
and Confer
The
motion shall be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration. (Code Civ. Proc.,
§ 2031.310, subd. (b)(2).) A meet and confer declaration in support of a motion
shall state facts showing a reasonable and good faith attempt at an informal
resolution of each issue presented by the motion. (Code Civ. Proc., §
2016.040.)
For purposes of
determining whether a motion to compel discovery was preceded by a reasonable
and good faith effort to meet and confer, such an attempt at informal
resolution requires something more than bickering with opposing counsel;
rather, the law requires that counsel attempt to talk the matter over, compare
their views, consult, and deliberate. (Clement v. Alegre (2009) 177
Cal.App.4th 1277, 1294.)
On September 18, 2023, Plaintiff sent
a meet and confer letter outlining electronically stored information
requirements. (Bedwan Decl., ¶ 16.) On November 28, 2023, Plaintiff sent a
further meet and confer letter about the apparent deficiencies in Defendant’s written
discovery responses and document production. (Bedwan Decl., ¶ 17.) Defendant
sent a meet and confer letter. (Bedwan Decl., ¶ 18.) Plaintiff filed the
instant motion on December 26, 2023. On August 15, 2024, Defendant filed an
opposition, addressing the discovery requests generally.
The Court is not persuaded that
counsel have exhausted their meet and confer obligations pursuant to the Code.
Counsel are advised that their meet and confer efforts should go beyond merely
sending letters stating their respective positions. (See Townsend v. Super.
Ct. (1998) 61 Cal.App.4th 1431, 1439.) “The level of effort at an informal
resolution which satisfies the ‘reasonable and good faith attempt’ standard
depends upon the circumstances. In a larger, more complex discovery request, a
greater effort at informal resolution may be warranted. In a simpler, or more
narrowly focused case, a more modest effort may suffice. The history of the
litigation, the nature of the interaction between counsel, the nature of the
issues, the type and scope of the discovery requested, the prospects for
success and other similar factors can be relevant. Judges have broad powers and
responsibilities to determine what measures and procedures are appropriate in
varying circumstances.” (Obregon v. Super. Ct. (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th
424, 431.)
Given the amount of discovery at issue,
the Court believes that further meet and confer efforts will resolve many of
the issues before the Court. Therefore, Counsel are ORDERED to make further
efforts to resolve the issues presented. If, after exhausting those efforts,
court intervention is needed, counsel may appear and argue the merits on the
continued hearing date. If counsel are unable to informally resolve their
discovery disputes, then counsel are instructed to submit a REVISED JOINT
SEPARATE STATEMENT with a detailed outline of the remaining disputed issues for
which a ruling is required. Counsel is also strongly advised to review the
standing case management conference order issued in Department F for guidance
on how to handle disputed items. The Court will follow the order. The revised
joint separate statement must be FILED on or before November 8, 2024.