Judge: Lisa R. Jaskol, Case: 20STCV48344, Date: 2023-07-11 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 20STCV48344    Hearing Date: July 11, 2023    Dept: 28

Having considered the moving and supplemental papers, the Court rules as follows. 

BACKGROUND 

On December 18, 2020, Plaintiffs Ernesto Licon Aguirre (“Aguirre”), Rosario Licon (“Licon”) and Cesar Armando Lopez (“Lopez”) filed this action against Defendants Concepcion H. Garcia (“Garcia”), Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department (“LASD”) and County of Los Angeles (“County”) for motor vehicle negligence. 

On February 26, 2021, Garcia and County filed an answer. 

On March 27, 2023, Garcia and County (“Moving Defendants”) filed Motions to Compel Plaintiffs’ IMEs to be heard on June 27, 2023. On May 8, 2023, Moving Defendants filed supplemental papers. 

On June 27, 2023, the Court continued the hearing to July 11, 2023 to obtain a Spanish language interpreter.

Trial is currently scheduled for October 3, 2023. 

PARTIES’ REQUESTS 

Moving Defendants request that the Court order Aguirre to attend an IME with orthopedic surgeon Thomas Grogan, M.D., on August 2, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. at 11704 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 11710, Los Angeles, California 90025.  Moving Defendants also request sanctions against Aguirre totaling $1,200.00. 

Moving Defendants request that the Court order Licon to attend an IME with orthopedic surgeon Thomas Grogan, M.D., on August 2, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. at 11704 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 11710, Los Angeles, California 90025. Moving Defendants also request sanctions against Lincon totaling $1,200.00. 

Moving Defendants request that the Court order Lopez to attend an IME with orthopedic surgeon Thomas Grogan, M.D., on August 2, 2023, at 11:00 a.m. at 11704 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 11710, Los Angeles, California 90025. Moving Defendants also request sanctions against Lopez totaling $1,200.00. 

LEGAL STANDARD 

        Code of Civil Procedure section 2032.220 provides: 

“(a) In any case in which a plaintiff is seeking recovery for personal injuries, any defendant may demand one physical examination of the plaintiff, if both of the following conditions are satisfied: 

“(1) The examination does not include any diagnostic test or procedure that is painful, protracted, or intrusive. 

“(2) The examination is conducted at a location within 75 miles of the residence of the examinee. 

“(b) A defendant may make a demand under this article without leave of court after that defendant has been served or has appeared in the action, whichever occurs first. 

“(c) A demand under subdivision (a) shall specify the time, place, manner, conditions, scope, and nature of the examination, as well as the identity and the specialty, if any, of the physician who will perform the examination. 

“(d) A physical examination demanded under subdivision (a) shall be scheduled for a date that is at least 30 days after service of the demand. On motion of the party demanding the examination, the court may shorten this time. 

“(e) The defendant shall serve a copy of the demand under subdivision (a) on the plaintiff and on all other parties who have appeared in the action.” 

Code of Civil Procedure section 2032.230 provides: 

“(a) The plaintiff to whom a demand for a physical examination under this article is directed shall respond to the demand by a written statement that the examinee will comply with the demand as stated, will comply with the demand as specifically modified by the plaintiff, or will refuse, for reasons specified in the response, to submit to the demanded physical examination. 

“(b) Within 20 days after service of the demand the plaintiff to whom the demand is directed shall serve the original of the response to it on the defendant making the demand, and a copy of the response on all other parties who have appeared in the action. On motion of the defendant making the demand, the court may shorten the time for response. On motion of the plaintiff to whom the demand is directed, the court may extend the time for response.” 

Code of Civil Procedure section 2032.310, subdivision (a) requires a party to obtain leave of court to obtain discovery by an additional physical exam or any mental exam. Code of Civil Procedure section 2032.310, subdivision (b) provides that a motion shall “specify the time, place, manner, conditions, scope, and nature of the examination, as well as the identity and the specialty, if any, of the person or persons who will perform the examination. The motion shall be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration under Section 2016.040.”  The court shall grant a motion for a physical or mental examination under section 3032.310 “only for good cause shown.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2032.320, subd. (a).) 

Code of Civil Procedure section 2023.030, subdivision (a) provides that “[t]he court may impose a monetary sanction ordering that one engaging in the misuse of the discovery process, or any attorney advising that conduct, or both pay the reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by anyone as a result of that conduct.”  Misuse of the discovery process includes “failing to respond or to submit to an authorized method of discovery.”  (Code Civ. Proc., §2023.010, subd. (d),) 

DISCUSSION 

A.   Aguirre’s IME 

Aguirre alleges that, as a result of the subject incident, he sustained injuries to his neck and low back. Moving Defendants originally noticed Aguirre’s IME with Dr. Grogan for February 28, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. Plaintiffs’ previous attorney agreed to have Aguirre appear for his IME, subject to certain requirements.  Moving Defendants agreed to those demands. Aguirre failed to appear for his IME. 

Moving Defendants are entitled to take Aguirre’s IME.  The Court finds good cause and grants Moving Defendants’ motion to compel Aguirre to attend his IME. 

B.   Lincon’s IME 

Lincon alleges that, as a result of the subject incident, she sustained injuries to her neck, upper to middle back, left breast and left shoulder. Moving Defendants originally noticed Lincon’s IME with Dr. Grogan for February 28, 2023, at 10:00 a.m.  Plaintiffs’ previous attorney agreed to have Lincon appear for her IME, subject to certain requirements. Moving Defendants agreed to those demands. Lincon failed to appear for her IME. 

Moving Defendants are entitled to take Lincon’s IME.  The Court finds good cause and grants Moving Defendants’ motion to compel Lincon to attend his IME. 

C.   Lopez’s IME 

Lopez alleges that, as a result of the subject incident, he sustained injuries to his neck and low back. Moving Defendants originally noticed Lopez’s IME with Dr. Grogan for February 28, 2023, at 11:00 a.m. Plaintiffs’ previous attorney agreed to have Lopez appear for his IME, subject to certain requirements. Moving Defendants agreed to those demands. Lopez failed to appear for his IME. 

Moving Defendants are entitled to take Lincon’s IME.  The Court finds good cause and grants Moving Defendants’ motion to compel Lincon to attend his IME. 

D.   Sanctions 

Moving Defendants are entitled to sanctions against Plaintiffs because they failed to appear for properly noticed IMEs.  Moving Defendants request $1,200.00 for each Plaintiff, based on 3 hours of attorney’s work at a rate of $400.00 per hour.  Moving Defendants state that two hours were spent drafting each motion, and one hour is anticipated in preparing a reply. 

The motions are unopposed, are substantially similar, and will be heard concurrently. The Court awards $250.00 in sanctions against each Plaintiff, based on 1 hour of attorney’s work at a reasonable rate of $250.00 per hour for each motion. 

CONCLUSION 

Defendants Concepcion H. Garcia and County of Los Angeles’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff Ernesto Licon Aguirre’s Independent Medical Exam is GRANTED. Aguirre is ordered to attend an IME with orthopedic surgeon Thomas Grogan, M.D., on August 2, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. at 11704 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 11710, Los Angeles, California 90025. 

Defendants Concepcion H. Garcia and County of Los Angeles’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff Rosario Licon’s Independent Medical Exam is GRANTED. Lincon is ordered to attend an IME with orthopedic surgeon Thomas Grogan, M.D., on August 2, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. at 11704 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 11710, Los Angeles, California 90025. 

Defendants Concepcion H. Garcia and County of Los Angeles’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff Cesar Armando Lopez ‘s Independent Medical Exam is GRANTED. Lopez is ordered to attend an IME with orthopedic surgeon Thomas Grogan, M.D., on August 2, 2023, at 11:00 a.m. at 11704 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 11710, Los Angeles, California 90025. 

Defendants Concepcion H. Garcia and County of Los Angeles’s Request for Sanctions is GRANTED. Plaintiffs Ernesto Licon Aguirre, Rosario Licon, and Cesar Armando Lopez are each ordered to pay Moving Defendants $250.00 in sanctions within 30 days of the hearing on the motion. 

Moving parties are ordered to give notice of this ruling. 

Moving parties are ordered to file the proof of service of this ruling with the Court within five days.