Judge: Lisa R. Jaskol, Case: 21STCV19527, Date: 2024-05-22 Tentative Ruling

All parties are urged to meet and confer with all parties concerning this tentative ruling to see if they can reach an agreed-upon resolution of their matter.  If you are able to reach an agreement, please notify the courtroom staff in advance of the hearing if you wish to submit on the tentative ruling rather than argue the motion by notifying the court by e-mailing the court at: SSCDEPT28@lacourt.org.  Include the word "SUBMITS" in all caps and the Case Number in the Subject line.  In the body of the email, please provide the date and time of the hearing, your name, your contact information, the party you represent, and whether that party is a plaintiff, defendant, cross-complainant, cross-defendant, claimant, intervenor, or non-party, etc.

            Please be advised that if you submit on the tentative and elect not to appear at the hearing, the opposing party may still appear at the hearing and argue the matter, and the court could change its tentative based upon the argument.  Unless you receive a submission from all other parties in the matter, you should assume that others might appear at the hearing to argue.  If you submit, but still intend to appear, include the words "SUBMITS, BUT WILL APPEAR" in the Subject line.     If you elect to argue your matter, you are urged to do so remotely, via Court-Connect.

                                       Note that once the Court has issued a tentative, the Court has the inherent authority not to allow the withdrawal of a motion and to adopt the tentative ruling as the order of the court.  This does not excuse a moving party's need to do one of the following: appear; submit; or take a matter off calendar by canceling the motion in the case reservation system before issuance of the tentative ruling if the matter moving party does not intend to proceed.    
 
            If you submitted a courtesy copy of your papers containing media (such as a DVD or thumb drive), unless you request the return of the media in your papers, the court will destroy it following the hearing of your matter.  



Case Number: 21STCV19527    Hearing Date: May 22, 2024    Dept: 28

Having considered the moving papers, the Court rules as follows. 

BACKGROUND 

On May 24, 2021, Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendants Gerardo Prado, Reliable Environmental Services, Inc. (“Reliable”), and Does 1-10 for subrogation. The complaint demanded damages of $43,296.79, interest at the rate of 10% per annum from June 10, 2020, and costs of suit. 

On July 29, 2021, Plaintiff filed a notice of settlement. 

On November 29, 2021, based on a stipulation between Plaintiff and Reliable, the Court dismissed the case without prejudice and retained jurisdiction under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 to enforce the terms of the settlement. The stipulation stated that if Reliable defaulted on the terms of the settlement, “judgment may be entered forthwith in favor of [Plaintiff] and against [Reliable] for damages in the principal sum of $43,296.79 plus interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) from June 10, 2020 and court costs,” less credit for Reliable’s payments to Plaintiff before the default. 

On March 18, 2024, Plaintiff filed a motion to vacate the dismissal, enforce the settlement, and enter judgment against Reliable, to be heard on May 22, 2024.  Reliable did not file an opposition. 

No trial date is currently scheduled. 

PARTY’S REQUESTS 

Plaintiff asks the Court to vacate the dismissal, enforce the settlement, and enter judgment against Reliable. 

LEGAL STANDARD 

Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 provides in part: 

“(a) If parties to pending litigation stipulate, in a writing signed by the parties outside of the presence of the court or orally before the court, for settlement of the case, or part thereof, the court, upon motion, may enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement. If requested by the parties, the court may retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce the settlement until performance in full of the terms of the settlement. 

“(b) For purposes of this section, a writing is signed by a party if it is signed by any of the following: 

“(1) The party. 

“(2) An attorney who represents the party. 

“(3) If the party is an insurer, an agent who is authorized in writing by the insurer to sign on the insurer’s behalf.” 

(Code Civ. Proc., § 664.6, subds. (a), (b).) 

DISCUSSION 

Plaintiff and Reliable stipulated that the Court would dismiss the action without prejudice.  In return, Reliable agreed to make installment payments to Plaintiff totaling $43,296.96.  If Reliable failed to make payments, Plaintiff could request the entry of judgment against Reliable for the amount still owed. 

Reliable made $7,608.08 in payments to Plaintiff but then defaulted.  Plaintiff asks the Court to enter judgment against Reliable and award $42,930.01.  Plaintiff’s counsel has submitted a declaration stating that the amount of the requested judgment “is calculated pursuant to paragraphs, 1, 4, and 5 of the Stipulation as follows: as follows: $35, 688.71 unpaid principal; $6,717.30 interest at the rate of 5% per annum on the unpaid principal; $524.00 costs for filing and service of process. 

Under the stipulation, the declaration of Plaintiff’s counsel “shall be conclusive proof of the fact of default of [Reliable] and of the amount then owing by [Reliable] to [Plaintiff].”  (Stipulation ¶ 8.) 

The Court grants the motion, vacates the November 29, 2021 dismissal, and awards Plaintiff $42,930.01 against Reliable. 

CONCLUSION 

The Court GRANTS the motion to vacate the dismissal, enforce the settlement, and enter judgment filed by Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.  The Court vacates the November 29, 2021 dismissal and awards Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company $42,930.01 against Reliable Environmental Services, Inc. 

Moving party is ordered to give notice of this ruling. 

Moving party is ordered to file the proof of service of this ruling with the Court within five days.