Judge: Lisa R. Jaskol, Case: 21STCV24894, Date: 2023-11-07 Tentative Ruling

Case Number: 21STCV24894    Hearing Date: December 29, 2023    Dept: 28

Having considered the moving papers, the Court rules as follows. 

BACKGROUND 

On July 7, 2021, Plaintiffs Raul Evangelista Herrera (“Herrera”) and Silvia De La Rosa (“De La Rosa”) filed this action against Defendants John Soto and Does 1-20 for motor vehicle tort and general negligence. 

On June 5, 2023, Defendant Juan Soto (erroneously sued and served as John Soto) (“Defendant”) filed an answer. 

On October 24, 2023, Plaintiffs’ counsel Eric H. Godoy and SoCal Injury Lawyers filed a motion to be relieved as counsel for Herrera.  The motion was set to be heard on December 29, 2023. 

Trial is set for March 13, 2024. 

COUNSEL’S REQUEST 

Plaintiffs’ counsel asks the Court to relieve them as counsel for Herrera. 

LEGAL STANDARD 

California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362, provides: 

“(a) Notice 

“A notice of motion and motion to be relieved as counsel under Code of Civil Procedure section 284(2) must be directed to the client and must be made on the Notice of Motion and Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel-Civil (form MC-051). 

“(b) Memorandum 

“Notwithstanding any other rule of court, no memorandum is required to be filed or served with a motion to be relieved as counsel. 

“(c) Declaration 

“The motion to be relieved as counsel must be accompanied by a declaration on the Declaration in Support of Attorney's Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel-Civil (form MC-052). The declaration must state in general terms and without compromising the confidentiality of the attorney-client relationship why a motion under Code of Civil Procedure section 284(2) is brought instead of filing a consent under Code of Civil Procedure section 284(1). 

“(d) Service 

“The notice of motion and motion, the declaration, and the proposed order must be served on the client and on all other parties who have appeared in the case. The notice may be by personal service, electronic service, or mail. 

“(1)  If the notice is served on the client by mail under Code of Civil Procedure section 1013, it must be accompanied by a declaration stating facts showing that either: 

“(A)   The service address is the current residence or business address of the client; or 

“(B)   The service address is the last known residence or business address of the client and the attorney has been unable to locate a more current address after making reasonable efforts to do so within 30 days before the filing of the motion to be relieved. 

“(2)  If the notice is served on the client by electronic service under Code of Civil Procedure section 1010.6 and rule 2.251, it must be accompanied by a declaration stating that the electronic service address is the client's current electronic service address. 

“As used in this rule, ‘current’ means that the address was confirmed within 30 days before the filing of the motion to be relieved. Merely demonstrating that the notice was sent to the client's last known address and was not returned or no electronic delivery failure message was received is not, by itself, sufficient to demonstrate that the address is current. If the service is by mail, Code of Civil Procedure section 1011(b) applies. 

“(e) Order 

“The proposed order relieving counsel must be prepared on the Order Granting Attorney's Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel-Civil (form MC-053) and must be lodged with the court with the moving papers. The order must specify all hearing dates scheduled in the action or proceeding, including the date of trial, if known. If no hearing date is presently scheduled, the court may set one and specify the date in the order. After the order is signed, a copy of the signed order must be served on the client and on all parties that have appeared in the case. The court may delay the effective date of the order relieving counsel until proof of service of a copy of the signed order on the client has been filed with the court.” 

(Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362.) 

DISCUSSION 

Counsel has submitted completed MC-051, MC-052 and MC-053 forms. Counsel has provided a declaration stating: “There has been a complete breakdown in the attorney-client relationship.” 

Counsel states that he served the moving papers on Herrera by mail at Herrera’s last known address. Despite his efforts, counsel could not confirm Herrera’s address or locate a more current address after mailing the motion papers, calling the last known telephone number, and contacting persons familiar with Herrera, including De La Rosa and Herrera’s sister Modesta Evangelista.  Counsel conducted internet searches on social media, telephone directories, and obituaries but could not confirm Herrera’s current address. 

Counsel has satisfied the requirements of California Rules of Court, rule 3.1362.  The Court grants the motion. 

CONCLUSION 

The Court GRANTS the motion of Eric H. Godoy and SoCal Injury Lawyers to be relieved as counsel for Plaintiff Raul Evangelista Herrera. 

Counsel will be relieved upon filing proof of service on Plaintiff Raul Evangelista Herrera of the Order Granting Attorney’s Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel--Civil (Judicial Council form MC-053). 

Counsel is ordered to give notice of this ruling. 

Counsel is ordered to file the proof of service of this ruling with the Court within five days.