Judge: Loren G. Freestone, Case: 37-2022-00043297-CU-BC-CTL, Date: 2024-04-12 Tentative Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,

DEPT.:

EVENT DATE:

EVENT TIME:

HALL OF JUSTICE

TENTATIVE RULINGS - April 11, 2024

04/12/2024  10:30:00 AM  C-64 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

JUDICIAL OFFICER:Loren G. Freestone

CASE NO.:

CASE CATEGORY:

EVENT TYPE:

CASE TITLE: CASE TYPE:

Civil - Unlimited  Breach of Contract/Warranty Demurrer / Motion to Strike 37-2022-00043297-CU-BC-CTL CALIFORNIA CLUB MEDS INC VS COMMERCIAL-DIAMOND LLC [IMAGED] CAUSAL DOCUMENT/DATE FILED:

TENTATIVE RULING California Club Med Inc. (CCM) was ordered to show cause why its complaint should not be stricken and why the case should not be dismissed without prejudice due to its lack of counsel.

The court may, at any time in its discretion, strike 'all or any part of any pleading not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court.' (Code Civ. Proc., § 436, subd. (b).) With limited exception, a corporation cannot represent itself in litigation. (See generally Merco Constr.

Engineers Inc. v. Municipal Court (1978) 21 Cal.3d 724.) As such, a complaint filed by a self-represented corporation may be stricken. (See CLD Construction Inc. v. City of San Ramon (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th 1141, 1145–1146.) The same rule inures when a complaint is initially filed by an attorney on behalf of a corporation, but the attorney later withdraws. 'The effect of the withdrawal is to leave the corporation without representation and without the ability to practice-self-representation. For the uncooperative corporate client who has not been willing to bring in new counsel, granting of the withdrawal motion will put extreme pressure on it to obtain new counsel of record for should it fail to do so it risks forfeiture of its rights through non-representation.' (Thomas G. Ferruzzo, Inc. v. Superior Court (1980) 104 Cal.App.3d 501, 503–504.) Courts have 'authority to dismiss an action if an unrepresented corporation does not obtain counsel within reasonable time.' (CLD Construction, supra, 120 Cal.App.4th at p. 1150.) The complaint in this case was filed by counsel. However, counsel for CCM was relieved effective November 13, 2023. (ROA #50–52.) The parties had previously stipulated to continue Defendant Commercial-Diamond LLC's demurrer until after the motion to be relieved was heard to allow CCM an opportunity to retain new counsel. (ROA #38.) It has been five months and CCM remains unrepresented. CCM also did not file any response to the OSC.

CCM's complaint is therefore stricken and the case is dismissed without prejudice.

In light of the above, Commercial-Diamond's demurrer is off calendar.

Calendar No.: Event ID:  TENTATIVE RULINGS

3090504  36