Judge: Malcolm Mackey, Case: 20STCV22167, Date: 2022-12-07 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 20STCV22167 Hearing Date: December 7, 2022 Dept: 55
GMP
ASSOCIATES, INC. v. RABIZADEH 20STCV22167
Hearing Date: 12/7/22,
Dept. 55
#9: MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO INTERVENE.
Notice: Okay
No
Opposition
MP:
Proposed Intervenor US SPECIALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY, on behalf of its insured HIGH DEFINITION GLASS (MOE 13).
RP:
Summary
On 6/12/20, Plaintiff GMP ASSOCIATES, INC. filed a Complaint
On 6/15/20, Plaintiff filed a First Amended
Complaint, alleging that the owner defendants agreed to pay for remodeling
of their owned home, but failed to pay for a significant portion of the
construction work.
The Plaintiff’s causes of action are:
1. BREACH
OF CONTRACT
2. REASONABLE
VALUE OF WORK
3. FORECLOSURE
OF MECHANICS LIEN.
On 8/3/20, Cross-Complaint was filed by
defendants RACHEL RABIZADEH and SHAWN RABIZADEH against Plaintiff, alleging Plaintiff
did remodeling having numerous construction defects.
On 8/24/22, defendants filed a motion seeking to
amend defendants’ Cross-Complaint, to include alter ego allegations and a
claim for Violations Penal Code Section 496(b).
On 4/27/21, a Cross-Complaint was filed by GMP
ASSOCIATES, INC. and GABRIEL MARTIN PEREZ, against MOES 1 through 50, regarding
getting indemnification pursuant to subcontractors’ agreements.
Requests for dismissals have been filed,
including on 9/27/22 and 10/6/22.
MP
Positions
Moving intervenor requests an order allowing
intervention, on grounds including the following:
·
HIGH DEFINITION GLASS is a suspended
corporation, which would be appearing through its insurer. California Revenue & Taxation Code §
19719.
·
Insurance carriers and counsel retained by
the carriers are excluded from penal sanctions, participating in such
litigation via intervention. Kaufman and Broad Communities, Inc. (2006) 136
Cal.App.4th 212, 217-18.
·
Allowing intervention of US SPECIALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY, one of HIGH DEFINITION GLASS’ liability insurers, is the only
way the insurer’s direct and immediate interests can be protected.
Tentative
Ruling
The unopposed motion is granted.
The proposed Complaint-In-Intervention attached to the
motion may be served and filed as a separate document, within 10 days.
To counter a risk that a judgment will be entered by
default, the insurance carrier is entitled to intervene in the underlying case,
to contest its insured's fault, and damages.
Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. of Am. v. Engel Insulation, Inc. (2018) 29
Cal. App. 5th 830, 836.