Judge: Malcolm Mackey, Case: 21STCV26958, Date: 2023-05-04 Tentative Ruling
Case Number: 21STCV26958 Hearing Date: May 4, 2023 Dept: 55
ANGEL
YINGLI CHANG v. LAIYING
SHANG 21STCV26958
Hearing Date: 5/4/23,
Dept. 55
#8: MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT LAIYING SHANG’S
ATTENDANCE AT DEPOSITION AND FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS OF $4,535.65.
Notice: Okay
No
Opposition
MP:
Plaintiff
RP:
Summary
On 7/22/21, Plaintiff filed a Complaint alleging that her
former employer failed to pay all wages, overtime, and those due at time of
separation/termination, and provide meal & rest periods and accurate wage
statements.
The causes of action are:
1. FAILURE TO PAY WAGES
[VIOLATION OF LABOR CODE §1194]
2. FAILURE TO PAY WAGES
AT TIME OF TERMINATION/SEPARATION [VIOLATION OF LABOR CODE §§201-203]
3. FAILURE TO PAY
OVERTIME WAGES [VIOLATION OF LABOR CODE §510]
4. FAILURE TO PROVIDE
MEAL AND REST PERIODS [VIOLATION OF LABOR CODE §226.7]
5. FAILURE TO PROVIDE
ACCURATE AND COMPLETE WAGE STATEMENTS [VIOLATION OF LABOR CODE §226]
6. UNFAIR AND FRAUDULENT
BUSINESS PRACTICES [VIOLATION OF BUS & PROF CODE §17200]
7. FALSE IMPRISONMENT.
On 3/28/23, Defendant LAIYING SHANG filed a Notice Of
Bankruptcy Discharge.
MP
Positions
Moving party requests an order compelling Defendant LAIYING
SHANG to appear for deposition and provide testimony and produce documents, and
imposing sanctions ($3,210.00), on grounds including the following:
·
Defendant LAIYING SHANG failed to appear
on March 29, 2023 for a noticed, continued deposition.
·
The continued deposition is necessary in
the discovery of relevant and admissible evidence concerning Defendant LAIYING
SHANG’s violations of the Labor Code..
·
Tentative
Ruling
The motion hearing is continued to 6/6/23, at 8:30
a.m. in Department 55.
Before that date, moving party shall serve and file a
brief on the issue whether the deponent’s notice of bankruptcy discharge has
any effect on pursuing the deposition. “A
discharge order under the Bankruptcy Code: extinguishes the debtor's personal
liability with respect to his creditor's claims; voids any judgment to the
extent of the debtor's personal liability for a discharged debt; and enjoins
the commencement or continuation of civil suits against the debtor personally
to recover any discharged debt.” Hurley
v. Bredehorn (1996) 44 Cal. App. 4th 1700, 1703.