Judge: Malcolm Mackey, Case: 22STCV04185, Date: 2023-09-06 Tentative Ruling



Case Number: 22STCV04185    Hearing Date: September 6, 2023    Dept: 55

H.C. AND S.A. v. CRESCENT HOTELS AND RESORTS, LLC,          22STCV04185

Hearing:  9/6/23,  Dept. 55.

#8:   DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT;  MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT.

 

Notice:  Okay

No Opposition

 

MP:  Defendant GREEN KNIGHT SECURITY, INC.

RP:  

 

 

Summary

 

On 2/2/22, two individual plaintiffs anonymously filed a Complaint using their names initials.

On 2/17/22, plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint, alleging that plaintiffs were patrons at the Mayfair Hotel at 1256 W 7th Street, Los Angeles, where a hotel security guard committed sexual battery on Plaintiff, a newlywed wife.

 

The causes of action are:

1. NEGLIGENCE

2. NEGLIGENT HIRING, RETENTION, AND SUPERVISION

3. INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS

4. NEGLIGENT INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS

5. PREMISES LIABILITY

6. ASSAULT

7. BATTERY

8. SEXUAL BATTERY

9. FALSE IMPRISONMENT

10. VIOLATION OF BANE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT

11. VIOLATION OF RALPH CIVIL RIGHTS ACT.

 

 

MP Positions

 

Moving party requests an order sustaining the demurrer to the First Amended Complaint, and granting the motion to strike treble and punitive damages and attorneys’ fees, on grounds including the following:

 

·         Plaintiffs’ negligence-based causes of action are improperly duplicative, redundant, based on identical theories of recovery, and subject to demurrer under well-established California case law.

·         Plaintiffs’ cause of action for Negligent Infliction of Emotion Distress fails, as it cannot be pled as a stand-alone cause of action.

·         Plaintiffs’ statutory based causes of action are rooted in vicarious liability theories which fail to plead any conduct within the course and scope employment with Green Knight, also the requisite knowledge and intent to establish the intentional torts.

·         Plaintiffs improperly claim treble damages in their prayer for damages. Plaintiffs improperly allege, in conclusory terms, they are entitled to punitive damages.  Plaintiffs improperly allege, in conclusory terms, that they are entitled to attorney’s fees.

 

 

Tentative Ruling

 

The unopposed demurrer is sustained, without leave to amend, based upon all of its page numbers.

The unopposed motion to strike is granted, without leave to amend, for the reasons stated.

The failure to file a proper and timely opposition in trial court creates a waiver of the issues on any appeal.  Bell v. Am. Title Ins. Co. (1991) 226 Cal. App. 3d 1589, 1602;  Cabrini Villas Homeowners Assn. v. Haghverdian (2003) 111 Cal. App. 4th 683, 693.  A judge in a civil case is not "'obligated to seek out theories [a party] might have advanced, or to articulate … that which … [a party] has left unspoken.'"  Mesecher v. County of San Diego (1992) 9 Cal. App. 4th 1677, 1686.  In order to obtain leave to amend, complainants must state how the allegations would be amended in order to state a cause of action.  Drum v. San Fernando Valley Bar Ass'n  (2010) 182 Cal.App.4th 247, 253.  Courts generally allow one time to amend a complaint, after sustaining a demurrer, without any request for leave to amend.  McDonald v. Sup. Ct. (1986) 180 Cal. App. 3d 297, 303;  City of Stockton v. Sup.Ct. (2007) 42 Cal.4th 730, 747.